Cameroon (July, 1998) - Revision history

HCargill: changed scoring for third party rights, market sharing,

2008-06-23T15:47:37Z

changed scoring for third party rights, market sharing,

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 23 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = 15'''		'''Score = 17'''

	''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)		''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)
Line 41:		Line 41:
	\|		\|
	\| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties		\| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §33 allows third parties to collect damages.

	\|-		\|-
Line 102:		Line 102:
	\| Other		\| Other
	\| 1		\| 1
	\| ~~Article 16~~ lists business failure as a consideration in merger assessment		\| §16 lists business failure as a consideration in merger assessment

	\|-		\|-
Line 179:		Line 179:
	\|		\|
	\| Market Sharing		\| Market Sharing
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §5 prohibits market sharing

	\|-		\|-

AchalOza at 13:31, 12 October 2007

2007-10-12T13:31:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 12 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = 16'''		'''Score = 15'''

	''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)		''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)

Kajrozga at 15:30, 8 September 2007

2007-09-08T15:30:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 8 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = 18'''		'''Score = 16'''

	''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)		''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)

Kajrozga at 21:54, 2 September 2007

2007-09-02T21:54:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 2 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = 18'''		'''Score = 18'''

	''Governed by:'' Law o. 98~~-13~~ of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)		''Governed by:'' Law 98/013 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)
	<ref>Available at http://www.spm.gov.cm/showtexte.php?idtexte=156&lang=en</ref>		<ref>Available at http://www.spm.gov.cm/showtexte.php?idtexte=156&lang=en</ref>

Kajrozga at 22:28, 12 August 2007

2007-08-12T22:28:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 12 August 2007
Line 185:		Line 185:
	\|		\|
	\| Eliminating Competitors		\| Eliminating Competitors
	\| 1		\| 0
	\| ~~§4 prohibits any agreement between firms that distorts competition.~~		\|

	\|-		\|-

Kajrozga at 04:13, 16 July 2007

2007-07-16T04:13:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 16 July 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:
	\| 3rd Party Initiation		\| 3rd Party Initiation
	\| 1		\| 1
	\| §35 allows any natural person or corporation to initiate an investigation.		\| §35 allows any natural person or corporation to initiate an investigation by the National Competition Committee

	\|-		\|-
Line 77:		Line 77:
	\| Merger Assessment		\| Merger Assessment
	\| Dominance		\| Dominance
	\| 1		\| 0
	\| ~~§16 lists market share as a consideration for merger approval.~~		\|

	\|-		\|-
Line 101:		Line 101:
	\|		\|
	\| Other		\| Other
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| Article 16 lists business failure as a consideration in merger assessment

	\|-		\|-

Kajrozga: New page: '''Score = 18''' ''Governed by:'' Law o. 98-13 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) Available at http://www.spm.gov.cm/showtexte.php?idtex...

2007-07-03T19:36:35Z

New page: '''Score = 18''' ''Governed by:'' Law o. 98-13 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) <ref>Available at http://www.spm.gov.cm/showtexte.php?idtex...

New page

'''Score = 18'''

''Governed by:'' Law o. 98-13 of 14 July 1998 relating to competition (hereinafter referred to as “Act”)
<ref>Available at http://www.spm.gov.cm/showtexte.php?idtexte=156&lang=en</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Category !! Subcategory !! Score !! Comment

|- class="categorydivision"
| Scope
| Extraterritoriality
| 1
| §2 extends the law to anything having an effect on the domestic market

|- class="categorydivision"
| Remedies
| Fines
| 1
| §24 allows fines for violations of the Act.

|-
|
| Prison Sentences
| 0
|

|-
|
| Divestitures
| 1
| §26 allows an improperly merged corporation to be dissolved.

|- class="categorydivision"
| Private Enforcement
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 1
| §35 allows any natural person or corporation to initiate an investigation.

|-
|
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
| 0
|

|-
|
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Notification
| Voluntary
| 0
|

|-
|
| Mandatory
| 3
| §18 requires mandatory pre-merger notification.

|-
|
| Pre-merger
| 2
| §18 requires mandatory pre-merger notification.

|-
|
| Post-merger
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| 1
| §16 lists market share as a consideration for merger approval.

|-
|
| Restriction of Competition
| 1
| §4 prohibits mergers that distort competition.

|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| 1
| §17 allows otherwise impermissible mergers when they improve the performance of the national economy.

|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro Authority)
| 0
|

|-
|
| Other
| 0
|

|-
|
| Efficiency
| 1
| §17 provides an efficiency defense for mergers that have some negative effects on competition.

|- class="categorydivision"
| Dominance
| Limits Access
| 1
| §11 prohibits limiting access.

|-
|
| Abusive Acts
| 1
| §4 prohibits abuses by dominant firms.

|-
|
| Price Setting
| 0
|

|-
|
| Discriminatory Pricing
| 0
|

|-
|
| Resale Price Maintenance
| 0
|

|-
|
| Obstacles to Entry
| 1
| §11 prohibits restricting market entry.

|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 1
| §12 creates an efficiency defense for §11 violations.

|- class="categorydivision"
| Restrictive Trade Practices
| Price Fixing
| 1
| §5 prohibits price fixing.

|-
|
| Tying
| 0
|

|-
|
| Market Division
| 0
|

|-
|
| Output Restraint
| 1
| §5 prohibits output restraint.

|-
|
| Market Sharing
| 0
|

|-
|
| Eliminating Competitors
| 1
| §4 prohibits any agreement between firms that distorts competition.

|-
|
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging
| 1
| §5 prohibits collusive tendering.

|-
|
| Supply Refusal
| 0
|

|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 1
| §6 provides an efficiency defense for §5 violations.

|}

== References ==
<references />