Estonia (March 8, 2003) - Revision history

Kajrozga at 18:59, 30 January 2008

2008-01-30T18:59:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 30 January 2008
Line 47:		Line 47:
	\| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings		\| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings
	\| 0		\| 0
	\|		\| §67 of the 2001 Act gave interested 3rd parties rights in proceedings however these were repealed in a 2002 amendment (RT I 2002, 82, 480).

	\|- class="categorydivision"		\|- class="categorydivision"

Kajrozga at 04:53, 9 January 2008

2008-01-09T04:53:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 9 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = 19'''		'''Score = 20'''

	''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).		''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).
Line 40:		Line 40:
	\|		\|
	\| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties		\| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §78 says that compensation for damages caused by violations of the Act could be dealt with through civil procedure.

	\|-		\|-

Kajrozga at 03:32, 9 January 2008

2008-01-09T03:32:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:32, 9 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Score = '''		'''Score = 19'''

	''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).		''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).

Kajrozga at 03:18, 9 January 2008

2008-01-09T03:18:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 9 January 2008
Line 76:		Line 76:
	\| Merger Assessment		\| Merger Assessment
	\| Dominance		\| Dominance
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §22(1)(1) says that the Competition Board may prohibits a merger if it would strengthen the dominant position.

	\|-		\|-
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\| Restriction of Competition		\| Restriction of Competition
	\| 1		\| 1
	\| §22(1) allows consideration of whether a merger creates barriers to entry.		\| §22(1)(1) allows consideration of whether a merger creates barriers to entry.

	\|-		\|-

Kajrozga at 03:13, 9 January 2008

2008-01-09T03:13:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 9 January 2008
Line 58:		Line 58:
	\|		\|
	\| Mandatory		\| Mandatory
	\| 1		\| 3
	\| §25 requires notification of concentrations.		\| §25 requires notification of concentrations.

Line 64:		Line 64:
	\|		\|
	\| Pre-merger		\| Pre-merger
	\| 1		\| 2
	\| §25 requires that the notification come within one week of one of the enumerated decisive acts.		\| §25 requires that the notification come within one week of one of the enumerated decisive acts.

Kajrozga at 03:13, 9 January 2008

2008-01-09T03:13:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 9 January 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).		''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).
	<ref>http://www.konkurentsiamet.ee/public/documents/eng/CompetitionAct.htm</ref>		<ref>http://www.konkurentsiamet.ee/public/documents/eng/CompetitionAct.htm</ref>

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-
Line 11:		Line 10:
	\| Scope		\| Scope
	\| Extraterritoriality		\| Extraterritoriality
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| § 1(2) states that the Act applies "if an act or omission directed at restricting competition is committed outside the territory of Estonia but restricts competition within the territory of Estonia"

	\|- class="categorydivision"		\|- class="categorydivision"
	\| Remedies		\| Remedies
	\| Fines		\| Fines
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §75 allows imposition of fines.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Prison Sentences		\| Prison Sentences
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §79 of the amended 2004 Act allows prison sentences for criminal violations.

	\|-		\|-
Line 59:		Line 58:
	\|		\|
	\| Mandatory		\| Mandatory
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §25 requires notification of concentrations.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Pre-merger		\| Pre-merger
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §25 requires that the notification come within one week of one of the enumerated decisive acts.

	\|-		\|-
Line 83:		Line 82:
	\|		\|
	\| Restriction of Competition		\| Restriction of Competition
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §22(1) allows consideration of whether a merger creates barriers to entry.

	\|-		\|-
Line 113:		Line 112:
	\| Dominance		\| Dominance
	\| Limits Access		\| Limits Access
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §16(2) lists limiting production and markets as an example of an abusive act.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Abusive Acts		\| Abusive Acts
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §16 prohibits abuse by dominant undertakings.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Price Setting		\| Price Setting
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §16(1) lists price setting as an example of an abusive act.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Discriminatory Pricing		\| Discriminatory Pricing
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §4(1)(5) lists applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent agreements as an abusive act.

	\|-		\|-
Line 155:		Line 154:
	\| Restrictive Trade Practices		\| Restrictive Trade Practices
	\| Price Fixing		\| Price Fixing
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §4(1)(1) prohibits price fixing

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Tying		\| Tying
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §4(1)(6) prohibits tying arrangements.

	\|-		\|-
Line 179:		Line 178:
	\|		\|
	\| Market Sharing		\| Market Sharing
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §4(1)(3) prohibits market sharing.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Eliminating Competitors		\| Eliminating Competitors
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §4(1)(3) prohibits attempts to exclude another person from the market.

	\|-		\|-
Line 197:		Line 196:
	\|		\|
	\| Supply Refusal		\| Supply Refusal
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §16(6) prohibits the unjustified refusal to sell or buy goods.

	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
	\| Efficiency Defense		\| Efficiency Defense
	\| 0		\| 1
	\|		\| §6(2) grants an exception to the §4 prohibitions for companies that contribute to technological and economic progress.

	\|}		\|}

Kajrozga: New page: '''Score = ''' ''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I ...

2008-01-09T02:47:52Z

New page: '''Score = ''' ''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I ...

New page

'''Score = '''

''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, as amended February 11 2003, entered into force March 8, 2003 (RT I 2003, 23, 133) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).
<ref>http://www.konkurentsiamet.ee/public/documents/eng/CompetitionAct.htm</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Category !! Subcategory !! Score !! Comment

|- class="categorydivision"
| Scope
| Extraterritoriality
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Remedies
| Fines
| 0
|

|-
|
| Prison Sentences
| 0
|

|-
|
| Divestitures
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Private Enforcement
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 0
|

|-
|
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
| 0
|

|-
|
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Notification
| Voluntary
| 0
|

|-
|
| Mandatory
| 0
|

|-
|
| Pre-merger
| 0
|

|-
|
| Post-merger
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| 0
|

|-
|
| Restriction of Competition
| 0
|

|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| 0
|

|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro Authority)
| 0
|

|-
|
| Other
| 0
|

|-
|
| Efficiency
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Dominance
| Limits Access
| 0
|

|-
|
| Abusive Acts
| 0
|

|-
|
| Price Setting
| 0
|

|-
|
| Discriminatory Pricing
| 0
|

|-
|
| Resale Price Maintenance
| 0
|

|-
|
| Obstacles to Entry
| 0
|

|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 0
|

|- class="categorydivision"
| Restrictive Trade Practices
| Price Fixing
| 0
|

|-
|
| Tying
| 0
|

|-
|
| Market Division
| 0
|

|-
|
| Output Restraint
| 1
| §4(1)(2) prohibits limiting production and service.

|-
|
| Market Sharing
| 0
|

|-
|
| Eliminating Competitors
| 0
|

|-
|
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging
| 0
|

|-
|
| Supply Refusal
| 0
|

|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 0
|

|}

== References ==
<references />