<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sweden_%28July_1%2C_1998%29</id>
	<title>Sweden (July 1, 1998) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sweden_%28July_1%2C_1998%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Sweden_(July_1,_1998)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T16:49:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Sweden_(July_1,_1998)&amp;diff=2134&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Kajrozga: New page: &#039;&#039;&#039;Score = 21&#039;&#039;&#039;  &#039;&#039;Governed by:&#039;&#039; Competition Act of 14 January 1993 (SFS 1993:20), as last amended July 1 1998 (SFS 1998:648) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).&lt;ref&gt;http...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Sweden_(July_1,_1998)&amp;diff=2134&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-01-16T02:26:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Score = 21&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Governed by:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Competition Act of 14 January 1993 (SFS 1993:20), as last amended July 1 1998 (SFS 1998:648) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Score = 21&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Governed by:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Competition Act of 14 January 1993 (SFS 1993:20), as last amended July 1 1998 (SFS 1998:648) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kkv.se/t/Page____905.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Category !! Subcategory !! Score !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Scope&lt;br /&gt;
| Extraterritoriality&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Remedies&lt;br /&gt;
| Fines&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §26-32 deal with fines for various infringements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Prison Sentences&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Divestitures&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Article 36 allows divesting a merger deemed improper&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Private Enforcement&lt;br /&gt;
| 3rd Party Initiation&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §23(2) allows 3rd parties to lodge complaints with the MD and order the termination of the infringement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §33 requires infringing companies to pay damages to the parties injured as a result of their violations.&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 3rd parties also have a right to appeal KKV decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Merger Notification&lt;br /&gt;
| Voluntary&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Mandatory&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| §37 requires pre-merger notifications for concentrations worth more than a certain monetary threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Pre-merger&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| §37 requires pre-merger notifications for concentrations worth more than a certain monetary threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Post-merger&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Merger Assessment&lt;br /&gt;
| Dominance&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §34a(2)(1) prohibits concentrations which strengthen or create a dominate position which will significantly restrict competition.&lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Restriction of Competition&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §34a(2)(1) prohibits concentrations which strengthen or create a dominate position which will significantly restrict competition.&lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Public Interest (Pro D)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Public Interest (Pro Authority)&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| § 41 allows Stockholm City Court , at the request of the Swedish Competition Authority, to prevent merger from going through due to public interest&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Other&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Efficiency&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Dominance&lt;br /&gt;
| Limits Access&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §19(2)(2) prohibits limiting production or market access.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Abusive Acts&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §19(1) prohibits any abuse by an undertaking in a dominant position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Price Setting&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §19(2)(1) prohibits price setting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Discriminatory Pricing&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §19(2)(3) prohibits applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions.&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Resale Price Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §6(2)(1) has been read as covering a prohibition on RPM.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Id. at 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Obstacles to Entry&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Efficiency Defense&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|- class=&amp;quot;categorydivision&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| Restrictive Trade Practices&lt;br /&gt;
| Price Fixing&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §6(2)(1) prohibits price fixing.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Tying&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Market Division&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Output Restraint&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §6(2)(2) prohibits limiting or controlling production.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Market Sharing&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §6(2)(3) prohibits market sharing.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Eliminating Competitors&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Supply Refusal&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| A system using quantitative criteria to refuse to supply a particular company or group of companies is thought to be covered under §6.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Id. at 423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| Efficiency Defense&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| §8(1) gives an exemption to the §6 prohibitions for agreements that contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress.&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kajrozga</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>