<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AIndia_%28January_13%2C_2003%29</id>
	<title>Talk:India (January 13, 2003) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AIndia_%28January_13%2C_2003%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Talk:India_(January_13,_2003)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T18:20:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Talk:India_(January_13,_2003)&amp;diff=401&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AchalOza: New page: == India 2003 Public Interest Def. ==  &#039;&#039;I&#039;m not sure if this should be coded as a public interest defense or an efficiency defense, although I&#039;m leaning towards the latter.&#039;&#039;  Article 20 ...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Talk:India_(January_13,_2003)&amp;diff=401&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-07-01T18:24:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: == India 2003 Public Interest Def. ==  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;I&amp;#039;m not sure if this should be coded as a public interest defense or an efficiency defense, although I&amp;#039;m leaning towards the latter.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  Article 20 ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== India 2003 Public Interest Def. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I&amp;#039;m not sure if this should be coded as a public interest defense or an efficiency defense, although I&amp;#039;m leaning towards the latter.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article 20 - &amp;quot;(4) For the purposes of determining whether a combination would have the effect of or is likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market, the Commission shall have due regard to . . . (n) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;whether the benefits of the combination outweigh the adverse impact of the combination&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[.]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 15:14, 26 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Efficiency defense seems to be implied here. --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 08:52, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AchalOza</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>