https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AMali_%28April_13%2C_1992%29 2026-04-22T18:19:48Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mali_(April_13,_1992)&diff=1121&oldid=prev 2007-07-24T12:20:11Z

<p>New page: == Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing == &#039;&#039;Looks like predatory pricing:&#039;&#039; Article 17 - &quot;[The following is a prohibited act:] the sale at a loss. [It is] regarded as sale at a loss, any resale ...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing ==<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;Looks like predatory pricing:&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> Article 17 - &quot;[The following is a prohibited act:] the sale at a loss. [It is] regarded as sale at a loss, any resale in the state of goods or products at a price lower than its effective purchase price.&quot;<br /> <br /> --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 06:50, 23 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing Defense ==<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;The statute seems to allow a type of efficiency defense for predatory pricing, however they do not have a broader dominance efficiency defense. How should I code this, I&#039;m leaning towards as a comment to price setting.&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> Article 17 - &quot;[The following] are not aimed by this measurement [prohibiting predatory pricing]: (1) resale of non durable products since they are threatened of fast detoriation; (2) voluntary or forced resale, moved by the suspension or the change of a commercial activity.&quot;<br /> <br /> --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 06:53, 23 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Hylton: do not include this as an efficiency defense, instead just mention it as a comment in price setting. --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)</div>

AchalOza