https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AThailand_%28March_15%2C_1999%29 2026-04-22T18:22:47Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Thailand_(March_15,_1999)&diff=1112&oldid=prev 2007-07-24T12:07:39Z

<p>New page: == Thailand 1999 Divestitures == &#039;&#039;Is this divestiture language?&#039;&#039; Section 8 - &quot;The Commission shall have the powers and duties as . . . (2) to issue Notifications prescribing market sha...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Thailand 1999 Divestitures ==<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;Is this divestiture language?&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> Section 8 - &quot;The Commission shall have the powers and duties as . . . (2) to issue Notifications prescribing market share and sales volume off any business by reference to which a business operator is deemed to have market domination[.]&quot;<br /> <br /> --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 15:01, 18 July 2007 (MDT)<br /> <br /> Hylton: not divestiture. --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 14:02, 23 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Thailand 1999 3rd Party Remedies ==<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;The &quot;claiming compensation&quot; language seems to imply that the 3rd party may initiate an action &#039;&#039;&#039;to get money&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> Section 40 - &quot;The person suffering an injury in consequence of the violation of section 25, section 26, section 27, section 28 or section 29 may initiate an action for &#039;&#039;&#039;claiming compensation from the violator&#039;&#039;&#039;.&quot;<br /> <br /> --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 15:09, 18 July 2007 (MDT)<br /> <br /> Hylton: yes, initiating an action for compensation is sufficient to establish 3rd party initiation. --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:07, 24 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Thailand 1999 Dominance Obstacles to Entry ==<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;Would this count as a prohibition against setting obstacles to entry?&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> Section 25(4) - &quot;[A dominant firm may not act by] intervening in the operation of business of other persons without justifiable reasons.&quot;<br /> <br /> --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 17:33, 18 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> Hytlon: no, this is just a general prohibition against abusive acts. --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:07, 24 July 2007 (EDT)</div>

AchalOza