User talk:AchalOza - Revision history

AchalOza: Egypt 2005 - Defenses

2007-10-08T04:58:28Z

Egypt 2005 - Defenses

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 8 October 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

			== Egypt 2005 - Defenses ==

			'''Article 9'''

			The provisions of this Law shall not apply to public utilities managed by the State.

			The Authority may, upon the request of the concerned parties, exempt some or all the acts provided for in articles 6 [on Restrictive Trade Practices], 7 [on Restrictive Trade Practices] and 8 [on Dominance] regarding public utilities that are managed by companies subject to the Private Law where this is in the public interest or for attaining benefits to the consumers that exceed the effects of restricting the freedom of competition. This shall be done in accordance with the regulations and procedures set out by the Executive Regulation of this Law.

			--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 00:58, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering

2007-10-08T04:49:43Z

Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 8 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

			== Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering ==

			Article 6(c) - "Coordinating with regard to proceeding or refraining from participating in tenders, auctions, negotiations and other calls for procurement."

			--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza at 12:19, 11 September 2007

2007-09-11T12:19:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 11 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Austria 2006 Merger Notification ==~~

	''The statute requires mandatory notification, but does not state whether it is pre or post. I've found this secondary source material. It states that the merger cannot take place until clearance, does that imply pre-merger notification?''

	~~http://www.iclg.co.uk/khadmin/Publications/pdf/591.pdf~~

	~~'''3.5 At what stage in the transaction timetable can the notification be filed?'''~~

	'''Basically a notification can be filed as soon as the parties have agreed on all relevant terms of the transaction. As already mentioned above, the Cartel Act does not set out any deadlines for notification. However, a concentration must not be implemented before clearance.'''

	~~--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 15:24, 24 July 2007 (EDT)~~

	~~Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)~~

	== Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry ==		== Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry ==

AchalOza: /* Algeria 2000 Tying */

2007-09-11T12:10:52Z

Algeria 2000 Tying

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 11 September 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== Algeria 2000 Tying ==		== Algeria 2000 Tying ==

	''One of the criteria for establishing ~~an abusive~~ dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds. Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP? The text below was translated with Google.''		''One of the criteria for establishing a dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds. Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP? Or should this be nothing since it's just establishing what is a dominant position and doesn't say it's an abusive act? The text below was translated with Google.''

	Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;		Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;

	--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: /* Algeria 2003 Dominance */

2007-09-11T12:08:25Z

Algeria 2003 Dominance

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 11 September 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)		Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

	== Algeria 2003 ~~Dominance~~ ==		== Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry ==

	''Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator). Does this sound like obstacles to entry language? Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.''		''Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator). Does this sound like obstacles to entry language? Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.''

AchalOza: Algeria 2000 Tying

2007-09-11T12:08:14Z

Algeria 2000 Tying

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 11 September 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

			== Algeria 2000 Tying ==

			''One of the criteria for establishing an abusive dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds. Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP? The text below was translated with Google.''

			Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;

			--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: Algeria 2003 Dominance

2007-09-11T12:01:22Z

Algeria 2003 Dominance

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 11 September 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)		Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

			== Algeria 2003 Dominance ==

			''Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator). Does this sound like obstacles to entry language? Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.''

			Article 3(c) - Dominant Position: the position allowing a company to hold, on the market in question, a position of economic power which '''gives him the capacity to make obstacle with the maintenance of an effective competition''', by providing him the possibility of independent behaviors in an appreciable measurement with respect to its competitors, of its customers or its suppliers;

			--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: /* Austria 2006 Merger Notification */

2007-07-25T14:19:44Z

Austria 2006 Merger Notification

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 25 July 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 15:24, 24 July 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 15:24, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

			Hylton: call this pre-merger notification. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 10:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: Austria 2006 Merger Notification

2007-07-24T19:24:22Z

Austria 2006 Merger Notification

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:24, 24 July 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== Austria 2006 Merger Notification ==

		''The statute requires mandatory notification, but does not state whether it is pre or post. I've found this secondary source material. It states that the merger cannot take place until clearance, does that imply pre-merger notification?''

		http://www.iclg.co.uk/khadmin/Publications/pdf/591.pdf

		'''3.5 At what stage in the transaction timetable can the notification be filed?'''

		'''Basically a notification can be filed as soon as the parties have agreed on all relevant terms of the transaction. As already mentioned above, the Cartel Act does not set out any deadlines for notification. However, a concentration must not be implemented before clearance.'''

		--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 15:24, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

AchalOza: Removing all content from page

2007-07-24T12:19:56Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 24 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing ==~~

	~~''Looks like predatory pricing:''~~

	Article 17 - "[The following is a prohibited act:] the sale at a loss. [It is] regarded as sale at a loss, any resale in the state of goods or products at a price lower than its effective purchase price."

	~~--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 06:50, 23 July 2007 (EDT)~~

	~~== Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing Defense ==~~

	''The statute seems to allow a type of efficiency defense for predatory pricing, however they do not have a broader dominance efficiency defense. How should I code this, I'm leaning towards as a comment to price setting.''

	Article 17 - "[The following] are not aimed by this measurement [prohibiting predatory pricing]: (1) resale of non durable products since they are threatened of fast detoriation; (2) voluntary or forced resale, moved by the suspension or the change of a commercial activity."

	~~--[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 06:53, 23 July 2007 (EDT)~~

	~~Hylton: do not include this as an efficiency defense, instead just mention it as a comment in price setting. --[[User:AchalOza\|AchalOza]] 13:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)~~