|
|
| (69 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Jamaica 2001 - 3rd party remedies == | | == Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing == |
|
| |
|
| ''Does this count?'' | | ''What do we think about this one?'' |
|
| |
|
| 48. (1) Every person who engages in conduct which constitutes—
| | imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms. |
| (a) a contravention of any of the obligations or prohibitions imposed in Parts III, IV, VI or VII;
| |
| (b) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the contravention of any such provision;
| |
| (c) inducing by treats, promises, or otherwise the contravention of any such provision;
| |
| (d) being knowingly conceived in or party to any such contravention; or
| |
| (e) conspiring with any other person to contravene any such provision,
| |
| '''is liable in damages for any loss caused to any other person by such conduct'''.
| |
| (2) An action under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within three years from the time when the cause of action arose.
| |
|
| |
|
| I'd double check with hylton, though i agree with you.
| | --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT) |
| --[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 12:58, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | |
|
| |
|
| == Jersey, Channel Islands - Generally ==
| |
|
| |
|
| This is not a recognized country by the US state department. It's an independent - non-European, non-British - nation, owned by the English Crown.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Jersey, Channel Islands - Merger public interest defense == | | == Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors == |
|
| |
|
| ''Efficiency? Public interest?'' | | ''Count it?'' |
|
| |
|
| 23 Exemption by Committee on grounds of public policy (Part 4)
| | Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same. |
| (1) The Committee may, after consulting the Authority, exempt a merger or
| |
| acquisition of a type prescribed by an Order made under Article 20(3)
| |
| from the requirement that it be approved by the Authority before
| |
| execution.
| |
| '''(2) The Committee shall not do so unless it is has satisfied itself that there
| |
| are exceptional and compelling reasons of public policy that make it
| |
| desirable to do so.'''
| |
| (3) When, in accordance with paragraph (1), the Committee consults the
| |
| Authority on a proposed exemption –
| |
| (a) the Authority must publish the advice it gives to the Committee;
| |
| and
| |
| (b) the Committee must publish its reasons for granting or refusing to
| |
| grant the exemption, as the case may be.
| |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 16:09, 11 July 2007 (EDT) | | --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT) |
| | |
| The rule we're using is default to efficiency defense unless the statute explicitly talks about "public interest", right? I think "public policy" is close enough to "public interest" to make this a public interest defense, but you should probably ask Hylton.
| |
| | |
| --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 09:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing
What do we think about this one?
imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms.
--JWSchneider 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors
Count it?
Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same.
--JWSchneider 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT)