Malawi (1998): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
New page: '''Score = 26''' ''Governed by:'' Malawi Competition and Fair Trading Bill of 1998. <ref>United Nations Conference on Trade and Development website, http://r0.unctad.org/en/subsites/cpol...
 
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 26'''
'''Score = 25'''


''Governed by:'' Malawi Competition and Fair Trading Bill of 1998.  
''Governed by:'' Malawi Competition and Fair Trading Bill of 1998.  
<ref>United Nations Conference on Trade and Development website, http://r0.unctad.org/en/subsites/cpolicy/Laws/malawi.pdf</ref>
<ref>United Nations Conference on Trade and Development website, http://r0.unctad.org/en/subsites/cpolicy/Laws/malawi.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/africa/Malawi/1doc.pdf</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 203: Line 203:
|  
|  
| Efficiency Defense
| Efficiency Defense
| 0
| 1
|  
| Article 44(1) provides a defense when the advantage of the agreement to Malawi outweigh the disadvantages.
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 13:32, 12 October 2007

Score = 25

Governed by: Malawi Competition and Fair Trading Bill of 1998. [1][2]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Sec. 2(5) extends scope to persons outside Malawi
Remedies Fines 1 Sec. 51 provides for fines
Prison Sentences 1 Sec. 51 provides for imprisonment
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Sec. 52 allows for 3rd party civil suits
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Sec. 52 allows for 3rd party damage recovery
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Sec. 35(1) requires authority from the commission
Pre-merger 2 Sec. 35(2) declares mergers invalid without authority
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Sec. 38(1)(a) considers ability to manipulate market
Restriction of Competition 1 Sec. 38(1)(a) considers whether merger will reduce competition
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 Sec. 38(1)(b) mentions several possible public interest factors that could benefit D
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 1 Sec. 38(2) considers the benefit to Malawi
Other 0
Efficiency 1 Sec. 38(1)(b)(i) allows for the efficiency defense
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 32(2) prohibits limiting access to markets
Abusive Acts 0
Price Setting 1 Article 32(2)(a) prohibits predatory pricing
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Sec. 32(2)(b) prohibits discriminatory pricing
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Sec. 32(2)(f) prohibits resale price maintenance
Obstacles to Entry 1 Sec. 41(1)(b) prohibits using dominance to prevent entry
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Sec. 32(2)(g) prohibits price fixing
Tying 1 Sec. 32(2)(c),(d) prohibit tying
Market Division 1 Sec. 33(3)(c) prohibits market allocation agreements
Output Restraint 1 Sec. 33(3)(f) prohibits output restraint
Market Sharing 1 Sec. 33(3)(c),(g) prohibit market sharing
Eliminating Competitors 1 Sec. 33(3)(a) prohibits eliminating competition
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Sec. 33(3)(b) prohibits collusive tendering and bid-rigging
Supply Refusal 1 Sec. 33(3)(f) prohibits supply refusal
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 44(1) provides a defense when the advantage of the agreement to Malawi outweigh the disadvantages.

References