Poland (December 15, 2000): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: '''Score = 20''' ''Governed by:'' The Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers of 15 December 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). <ref>http://www.konsument.gov... |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Private Enforcement | | Private Enforcement | ||
| 3rd Party Initiation | | 3rd Party Initiation | ||
| | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 20:26, 12 February 2008
Score = 20
Governed by: The Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers of 15 December 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | The Act applies to all actions that have effects on Poland (Article 1) |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Article 101 allows the OCCP to impose fines for certain violations. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 1 | Article 18 allows divestiture of merging parties before consent to a merger | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 0 | |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 0 | ||
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 | ||
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | Article 13 requires notice of mergers over a certain turnover threshold | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | Article 13 requires notice before the merger agreement has taken effect | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Article 19 allows President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection to prevent a merger because of the potentially dominant position of the acquiring entity. |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | Article 19 allows President of the Office to prevent a merger due to its restrictive impact on competition | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 1 | Article 19 allows President of the Office to consent to an otherwise impermissible merger if it promotes economic development, technological progress, or the national economy
| |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 8(2)(2) lists limiting production and markets as an abusive act. |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | Article 8 lists abusive acts by companies in a dominant position. | |
| Price Setting | 1 | Article 8 (2)(1) lists the imposition of prices as an abusive act (includes predatory pricing) | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 8 (2)(1) lists the imposition of prices as an abusive act (includes predatory pricing)
Article 8 (2) (3) prohibits imposing non-homogenous terms on similar transactions
| |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 0 | ||
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | Article 8(5) of the Act prohibits counteracting the formation of conditions necessary for the development of competition. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 0 | ||
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 5(1) prohibits price fixing. |
| Tying | 1 | Article 5(5) prohibits tying arrangements. | |
| Market Division | 0 | ||
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 5(2) prohibits limiting or controlling production. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | Article 5(3) prohibits market sharing agreements | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Article 5(6) prohibits eliminating undertakings from the market. | |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Article 5(7) prohibits collusive tendering. | |
| Supply Refusal | 0 | ||
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 7 give an exemption to the Article 5 prohibitions for agreements that improve production or distribution or promote economic and technical progress. |