Poland (February 16, 2007): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 21'''
'''Score = 22'''


''Governed by:'' The Act of 16 February 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  
''Governed by:'' The Act of 16 February 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  
Line 146: Line 146:
|  
|  
| Obstacles to Entry
| Obstacles to Entry
| 0
| 1
|
| Article 9(5) prohibits "counteracting formation of conditions necessary for the emergence or development of competition"
|-
|-
Line 188: Line 188:
|  
|  
| Eliminating Competitors
| Eliminating Competitors
| 0
| 1
|  
| Article 6(6) prohibits "eliminating from the market undertakings"
|-
|-

Latest revision as of 03:10, 21 February 2008

Score = 22

Governed by: The Act of 16 February 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 1(2) states that the Act applies to any "practices or concentrations cause or may cause effects in the territory."
Remedies Fines 1 Article 106 allows imposing fines for violations of the Act.
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 1 Article 21 enables divestiture of an improper merger.
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 0
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 0
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 1 Article 50 states that "everyone shall be entitled to submit . . . explanations concerning essential circumstances of a given case."
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Notification of mergers is mandatory
Pre-merger 2 The Act requires notification pre-merger.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Article 20 prohibits concentrations that strengthen a dominant position.


Restriction of Competition 1 Article 20 prohibits concentrations that strengthen a dominant position.


Public Interest (Pro D) 1 The Authority will allow an otherwise impermissible merger to go through
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 1 The Competition Authority will "look favourably on a merger if it contributes to economic development or technical progress or has the potential to have a positive effect on the national economy."[2]


Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 9(2)(2) prohibits "limiting production"
Abusive Acts 1 Article 9 prohibits "abuse of dominant position."
Price Setting 1 Article 9(2)(1) prohibits price fixing.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 6(4) prohibits discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 9(5) prohibits "counteracting formation of conditions necessary for the emergence or development of competition"
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 6(1) prohibits price fixing.
Tying 1 Article 6(5) prohibits tying arrangements.
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 Article 6(2) prohibits "limiting or controlling production." Article 6(6) prohibits "limiting access."
Market Sharing 1 Article 6(3) prohibits market sharing.
Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 6(6) prohibits "eliminating from the market undertakings"
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 6(7) prohibits bid rigging.
Supply Refusal 0
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 8(1) permits otherwise impermissible agreements if they "contribute to improvement of the production, distribution of goods or to technical or economic progress"

References