France, 1986: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
HCargill (talk | contribs)
New page: '''This page is under construction. Please check back in mid-July, 2008.''' 1986 saw the passage of a major competition law, Ordinance No. 86-1243 of December 1, 1986.<ref>The text of the...
 
HCargill (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''This page is under construction. Please check back in mid-July, 2008.'''
'''Score = 19 '''


1986 saw the passage of a major competition law, Ordinance No. 86-1243 of December 1, 1986.<ref>The text of the statute is available in ''French Law, Constitution and Selective Legislation,'' George A. Bermann & Vivian G. Curran, 1998, section 5 (last updated, 1994). The edition notes the legislative changes, and the 1994 changes do not affect the 1986 scoring.</ref>  This replaced Ordinnance No. 45-1243 of June 30, 1945. 1986 also saw the repeal of Penal Code Art. 419 (after 176 years)<ref>in Provision 57 of the statute</ref>.
1986 saw the passage of a major competition law, Ordinance No. 86-1243 of December 1, 1986.<ref>The text of the statute is available in ''French Law, Constitution and Selective Legislation,'' George A. Bermann & Vivian G. Curran, 1998, section 5 (last updated, 1994). The edition notes the legislative changes from the original 1986 statute.</ref>  This replaced Ordinnance No. 45-1243 of June 30, 1945 and its modifications, as well as Law No. 77-806 of 19 July 1977 (the old Merger Reg). 1986 also saw the repeal of Penal Code Art. 419 (after 176 years!)<ref>in Provision 57 of the statute</ref>.
 
''Governed by:'' Ordinance no. 86-1243 of 1 December 1986.<ref>the full French text of the 1986 statute is available from Legifrance, starting at http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jopdf/common/jo_pdf.jsp?numJO=0&dateJO=19861209&pageDebut=14773&pageFin=&pageCourante=14773</ref>
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Category !! Subcategory !! Score !! Comment
 
|- class="categorydivision"
| Scope
| Extraterritoriality
| 0
|
 
|- class="categorydivision"
| Remedies
| Fines
| 1
| Articles 13 and 17 provide for fines for competition violations.
 
|-
|
| Prison Sentences
| 1
| Article 17 provides for prison sentences for key players in fraudulent competition violations.
 
|-
|
| Divestitures
| 1
| Art. 42 of the statute provides for divestitures of anticompetitive mergers.
 
 
|- class="categorydivision"
| Private Enforcement
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 1
| Article 11 allows some third parties to initiate investigations.
 
|-
|
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
| 1
| Article 36 establishes tort liability in limited circumstances, including discriminatory pricing.
|-
|
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings
| 0
|
 
|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Notification
|Voluntary
| 1
| Art. 38 states that merging companies may notify the government of the merger.
|-
|
| Mandatory
| 0
|
|-
|
| Pre-merger
| 0
|
|-
|
| Post-merger
| 1
| Article 38 says that the government may be notified of a merger up to 3 months after the merger.
|- class="categorydivision"
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| 1
| Art. 38 states that one criteria for merger notification is creation of a dominant position.
|-
|
| Restriction of Competition
| 1
| Art. 38 states that restriction of competition is a factor in merger consideration.
|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| 1
| Art. 40 allows for economic progress from the merger to count in the merging companies' favor.
|-
|
| Public Interest (Pro Authority)
| 0
|
|-
|
| Other
| 1
| Art. 41 allows for consideration of "the competitiveness of the enterprises concerned from the standpoint of international competition" in merger consideration.
|-
|
| Efficiency
| 0
|
 
|- class="categorydivision"
| Dominance
| Limits access
| 0
|
|-
|
| Abusive Acts
| 1
| Art. 8 prohibits abuse of a dominant position.
 
|-
|
| Price Setting
| 1
| Article 8 incorporates part of Art. 7, which prohibits price setting.
 
|-
|
| Discriminatory Pricing
| 1
| Art. 8 prohibits discriminatory pricing.
|-
|
| Resale Price Maintenance
| 1
| Art. 34 bans resale price maintenance.
|-
|
| Obstacles to Entry
| 0
|
|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 1
| Art. 10.2 allows a limited efficiency defense.
|- class="categorydivision"
| Restrictive Trade Practices
| Price Fixing
| 1
| Art. 7 bans price fixing.
|-
|
| Tying
| 1
| Art. 8 bans tying.
 
|-
|
| Market Division
| 1
| Art. 7 bans market division.
|-
|
| Output Restraint
| 1
| Art. 7.3 bans output restraint.
|-
|
| Market Sharing
|
|
|-
|
| Eliminating Competitors
| 1
| Art. 7 prohibits agreements which impede competition.
|-
|
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging
| 0
|
|-
|
| Supply Refusal
|1
| Art. 8 prohibits supply refusal by cartels.
 
|-
|
| Efficiency Defense
| 1
| Art. 10.2 provides for a limited efficiency defense.
|}
 
== References ==
<references />

Latest revision as of 16:24, 10 July 2008

Score = 19

1986 saw the passage of a major competition law, Ordinance No. 86-1243 of December 1, 1986.[1] This replaced Ordinnance No. 45-1243 of June 30, 1945 and its modifications, as well as Law No. 77-806 of 19 July 1977 (the old Merger Reg). 1986 also saw the repeal of Penal Code Art. 419 (after 176 years!)[2].

Governed by: Ordinance no. 86-1243 of 1 December 1986.[3]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 0
Remedies Fines 1 Articles 13 and 17 provide for fines for competition violations.
Prison Sentences 1 Article 17 provides for prison sentences for key players in fraudulent competition violations.
Divestitures 1 Art. 42 of the statute provides for divestitures of anticompetitive mergers.


Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Article 11 allows some third parties to initiate investigations.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Article 36 establishes tort liability in limited circumstances, including discriminatory pricing.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 1 Art. 38 states that merging companies may notify the government of the merger.
Mandatory 0
Pre-merger 0
Post-merger 1 Article 38 says that the government may be notified of a merger up to 3 months after the merger.
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Art. 38 states that one criteria for merger notification is creation of a dominant position.
Restriction of Competition 1 Art. 38 states that restriction of competition is a factor in merger consideration.
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 Art. 40 allows for economic progress from the merger to count in the merging companies' favor.
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 1 Art. 41 allows for consideration of "the competitiveness of the enterprises concerned from the standpoint of international competition" in merger consideration.
Efficiency 0


Dominance Limits access 0
Abusive Acts 1 Art. 8 prohibits abuse of a dominant position.
Price Setting 1 Article 8 incorporates part of Art. 7, which prohibits price setting.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Art. 8 prohibits discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Art. 34 bans resale price maintenance.
Obstacles to Entry 0
Efficiency Defense 1 Art. 10.2 allows a limited efficiency defense.
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Art. 7 bans price fixing.
Tying 1 Art. 8 bans tying.
Market Division 1 Art. 7 bans market division.
Output Restraint 1 Art. 7.3 bans output restraint.
Market Sharing
Eliminating Competitors 1 Art. 7 prohibits agreements which impede competition.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 0
Supply Refusal 1 Art. 8 prohibits supply refusal by cartels.


Efficiency Defense 1 Art. 10.2 provides for a limited efficiency defense.

References

  1. The text of the statute is available in French Law, Constitution and Selective Legislation, George A. Bermann & Vivian G. Curran, 1998, section 5 (last updated, 1994). The edition notes the legislative changes from the original 1986 statute.
  2. in Provision 57 of the statute
  3. the full French text of the 1986 statute is available from Legifrance, starting at http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jopdf/common/jo_pdf.jsp?numJO=0&dateJO=19861209&pageDebut=14773&pageFin=&pageCourante=14773