Albania (July 28, 2003): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 20'''
'''Score = 20'''


''Governed by:'' Law No. 9121, dated July 28, 2003 On Competition Protection.
''Governed by:'' Law No. 9121 on Competition Protection, came into force July 28, 2003
<ref>Global Competition Forum (GCF) Website, http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/europe/Albania/Approved%20Law%209121%20A.pdf</ref>
<ref>Global Competition Forum (GCF) Website, http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/europe/Albania/Approved%20Law%209121%20A.pdf</ref>


Line 84: Line 84:
| Restriction of Competition
| Restriction of Competition
| 0
| 0
| Art. 13(2) provides a defense that a firm would exit the market in the near future if the merger does not take place.
|  
|-
|-
Line 101: Line 101:
|  
|  
| Other
| Other
| 0
| 1
|  
| Art. 13(2)(a) provides a business failure defense for a firm that would exit the market in the near future if the merger does not take place.
|-
|-
Line 126: Line 126:
| Price Setting
| Price Setting
| 1
| 1
| Art. 9(2)(a) prohibits price setting
| Art. 9(2)(a) prohibits price setting.  Art. 9(2)(d) prohibits predatory pricing.


|-
|-

Latest revision as of 00:35, 14 January 2009

Score = 20

Governed by: Law No. 9121 on Competition Protection, came into force July 28, 2003 [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Art. 2(1)(b) extends scope beyond Albania
Remedies Fines 1 Art. 73-78 provide for fines
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 1 Art. 62(1) allows divestiture
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Art. 65(1) allows 3rd party civil proceedings
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Art. 65(1)(a),(b) provides for remedies to 3rd parties
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 1 Art. 47(1) invites 3rd parties to intervene
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Art. 74(1) provides for fines if no notification given
Pre-merger 2 Art. 14(1) requires pre-merger notification.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Art. 13(1) considers dominant position
Restriction of Competition 0
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 1 Art. 13(2)(a) provides a business failure defense for a firm that would exit the market in the near future if the merger does not take place.
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 1 Art. 9(2)(b) prohibits limiting production, markets
Abusive Acts 1 Art. 9(1) prohibits abuse of dominant position
Price Setting 1 Art. 9(2)(a) prohibits price setting. Art. 9(2)(d) prohibits predatory pricing.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Art. 9(2)(c) prohibits discriminatory pricing
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 1 Art. 9(2)(d) prohibits preventing entry
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Art. 4(1)(a) prohibits price fixing
Tying 1 Art. 4(1)(d) prohibits tying
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 Art. 4(1)(b) prohibits limiting or controlling production, markets
Market Sharing 1 Art. 4(1)(c) prohibits market sharing
Eliminating Competitors 0
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 0
Supply Refusal 0
Efficiency Defense 1 Art. 5(1), Art. 6(1) allow for efficiency defense

References