Brazil 2000: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 21'''
'''Score = 22'''


''Governed by:'' Law #8884 of June 11 1994<ref>Global Competition Forum website, http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/s_america/Brazil/Legisla%E7%E3o%20Antitruste%20em%20ingl%EAs.PDF</ref> last amended by Law No. 10149 of December 21, 2000<ref>Global Competition Forum website, http://www.fazenda.gov.br/seae/english/Legislation/law.pdf</ref> (all hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).
''Governed by:'' Law No. 8884 of June 11 1994<ref>Global Competition Forum website, http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/s_america/Brazil/Legisla%E7%E3o%20Antitruste%20em%20ingl%EAs.PDF; http://www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/document_center/legislation/brazilian-antitrust-law.pdf</ref> last amended by Law No. 10149 of December 21, 2000<ref>Global Competition Forum website, http://www.fazenda.gov.br/seae/english/Legislation/law.pdf; http://www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/document_center/legislation/law.pdf</ref> (all hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 17: Line 17:
| Fines
| Fines
| 1
| 1
| Article 23 imposes fines for certain violations.
| Articles 23-27 imposes fines for certain violations.


|-
|-
Line 35: Line 35:
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 1
| 1
| Article 29 provides a cause of action and possible remedies for injured 3rd parties.
| Articles 29 and 30 provides a cause of action and possible remedies for injured 3rd parties.


|-
|-
Line 76: Line 76:
| Merger Assessment
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| Dominance
| 0
| 1
|  
| Article 54(3) defines a dominant position post-merger as a firm holding more than 20% of relevant market share.
|-
|-
Line 191: Line 191:
|  
|  
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging
| 0
| 1
|  
| Article 21(VIII) prohibits bid-rigging for public contracts.
|-
|-

Latest revision as of 21:18, 5 February 2009

Score = 22

Governed by: Law No. 8884 of June 11 1994[1] last amended by Law No. 10149 of December 21, 2000[2] (all hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 2 says that the Act applies to anything that has an effect within Brazil.
Remedies Fines 1 Articles 23-27 imposes fines for certain violations.
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Articles 29 and 30 provides a cause of action and possible remedies for injured 3rd parties.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Article 29 provides a cause of action and possible remedies for injured 3rd parties.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Article 54(4)[3] requires notification of mergers.
Pre-merger 0
Post-merger 1 Article 54(4) says that the notification must come 15 days after the merger.
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Article 54(3) defines a dominant position post-merger as a firm holding more than 20% of relevant market share.
Restriction of Competition 1 Article 54 prohibits merger agreements that restrict competition.


Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 1 Article 54(I)(c) allows an exception to the prohibition if the agreement increases efficiency.
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 21(VI) prohibits limiting access of competitors to input, material, or equipment.
Abusive Acts 1 Article 20(IV) prohibits the abuse of one’s market control.
Price Setting 1 Article 21(I) prohibits price setting.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 21(XII) prohibits discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Article 21(XI) prohibits RPM.
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 21(IV) prohibits limiting market access by new companies.
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 21(I) prohibits price fixing.
Tying 1 Article 21(XXIII) prohibits tying arrangements.
Market Division 1 Article 21(III) prohibits market apportionment.
Output Restraint 1 Article 21(X) prohibits limiting production and development.
Market Sharing 0
Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 21(V) prohibits posing difficulties for the development of a competitor company.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 21(VIII) prohibits bid-rigging for public contracts.
Supply Refusal 1 Article 21(XIII) prohibits supply refusal.
Efficiency Defense 0

References

  1. Global Competition Forum website, http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/s_america/Brazil/Legisla%E7%E3o%20Antitruste%20em%20ingl%EAs.PDF; http://www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/document_center/legislation/brazilian-antitrust-law.pdf
  2. Global Competition Forum website, http://www.fazenda.gov.br/seae/english/Legislation/law.pdf; http://www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/document_center/legislation/law.pdf
  3. The 1994 Act does not specify that the provisions of Article 54 are meant to apply to mergers and acquisitions but this is made clear in the 2000 amendment