|
|
| (19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Zambia 1994 - Limits access == | | == Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing == |
|
| |
|
| ''Does this count?'' | | ''What do we think about this one?'' |
|
| |
|
| (2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (1), enterprises shall refrain
| | imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms. |
| from the following acts or behaviour if through abuse or acquisition of a
| |
| dominant position of market power, ''they limit access to markets'' or
| |
| otherwise unduly restrain competition, or have or are likely to have
| |
| adverse effect on trade or the economy in general
| |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:48, 23 July 2007 (EDT) | | --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| == Zambia 1994 - Merger defenses ==
| |
|
| |
|
| ''How do we categorize this?''
| |
|
| |
|
| Other public interest considerations may include: the
| | == Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors == |
| equitable distribution of wealth; prevention of
| |
| unemployment, need to implement an industrial police; to
| |
| indigenise national economics.
| |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 16:15, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| | ''Count it?'' |
|
| |
|
| | Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same. |
|
| |
|
| Achal: Public interest. (Pro-D) --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 10:37, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
| | --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT) |
| | |
| == Zambia 1994 - Merger assessment - Other - Business Failure ==
| |
| | |
| ''This is from a Zambian Competition Commission report'' (http://www.globalcompetitionforum.org/regions/africa/Zambia/Competition%20Rules%20in%20Zambia.PDF)
| |
| | |
| "The Commission, in some instances, ''''will authorize a dominant undertaking to acquired a failing competitor'''' if there is cause that there will be more efficient use of resources which may be achieved through the merger or acquisition, and consequently convey substantial benefits to the community."
| |
| | |
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 16:19, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| | |
| Hylton: Count this as business failure. --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 10:36, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Zimbabwe 2001 - Predatory Pricing ==
| |
| | |
| ''Found Predatory Pricing prohibition under Amendment 14 of 2001 amendments to the Competition Act of 1996''
| |
| | |
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 16:33, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Netherlands 1999 - Merger assessment - Efficiency ==
| |
| | |
| ''Does this count?''
| |
| | |
| Article 47(1) - Our Minister may, after the director general has refused a licence for the
| |
| realisation of a concentration, decide in response to a request to that effect
| |
| that the licence shall be granted if, in the Minister's view, this is necessary for
| |
| serious reasons in the general interest, which outweigh the expected
| |
| restriction of competition.
| |
| | |
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 12:00, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Bosnia 2005 - Merger assessment - public interest (pro-authority) ==
| |
| | |
| ''This was marked as pro-authority, but I have my doubts.''
| |
| | |
| ''Article 17''
| |
| ''Appraisal of Concentrations''
| |
| In making the assessment of intended concentration, the Council of Competition shall analyze the positive and
| |
| negative effects, or whether that concentration creates or strengthens dominant position which will result in the
| |
| significant distortion of market competition, in particular:
| |
| *a) the structure of the relevant market;
| |
| *b) the effects of the concentration concerned on other actual and potential competitors;
| |
| *c) the market position of parties in competition, their market shares, economic and financial power;
| |
| *d) alternatives available to suppliers and users;
| |
| *e) economic, legal and other barriers to entry to the market;
| |
| *f) level of internal and international competitiveness of the parties to concentration;
| |
| *g) supply and demand trends for the relevant goods and/or services;
| |
| *h) the trends of technical and economic progress;
| |
| *i) consumers` interests.
| |
| | |
| --[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 16:05, 24 July 2007 (EDT) | |
Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing
What do we think about this one?
imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms.
--JWSchneider 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors
Count it?
Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same.
--JWSchneider 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT)