User talk:AchalOza: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Albania 2002 Public Interest Pro-D
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Egypt 2005 - Defenses
 
(181 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Austria 2000 Divestures ==
== Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry ==


I think this should be coded as a divesture:
''Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator).  Does this sound like obstacles to entry language?  Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.''


§35(2) - "The Cartel Court . . . [shall] in addition also order [the group] to take measures by which the market-dominating position will be weakened or eliminated, if: (a) the undertaking has repeatedly abused its market-dominating position; (b) the abuses may impair media diversity; and (c) it is expected that, without such measures, further abuses of this type will occur."
Article 3(c) - Dominant Position: the position allowing a company to hold, on the market in question, a position of economic power which '''gives him the capacity to make obstacle with the maintenance of an effective competition''', by providing him the possibility of independent behaviors in an appreciable measurement with respect to its competitors, of its customers or its suppliers;


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 11:02, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


== Albania 2002 Pre-Merger Notification ==
== Algeria 2000 Tying ==


This sounds like a pre-merger notification requirement:
''One of the criteria for establishing a dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds.  Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP?  Or should this be nothing since it's just establishing what is a dominant position and doesn't say it's an abusive act?  The text below was translated with Google.''


Art. 14(1) - "A concentration, under article 10, shall not be put into effect either:
Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;
a) before its notification nearby the Authority or  
b) until it has been authorized by the Authority, or  
c) until conditions attached to the authorization are fulfilled."


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 12:53, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


== Albania 2002 Public Interest Pro-D ==
== Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering ==


Does this sound like a public interest (or efficiency) defense to you?
Article 6(c) - "Coordinating with regard to proceeding or refraining from participating in tenders, auctions, negotiations and other calls for procurement."


2. Commission may not prohibit concentrations where one of the undertakings risks
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
seriously a failure, there is no less anti­competitive alternative to the concentration, when:


a) this undertaking is in such a situation that without the concentration it would
== Egypt 2005 - Defenses ==
exit the market in the near future;


b) there is no serious prospects of re­organizing the activity of this undertaking.
'''Article 9'''


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 12:57, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
The provisions of this Law shall not apply to public utilities managed by the State.
 
The Authority may, upon the request of the concerned parties, exempt some or all the acts provided for in articles 6 [on Restrictive Trade Practices], 7 [on Restrictive Trade Practices] and 8 [on Dominance] regarding public utilities that are managed by companies subject to the Private Law where this is in the public interest or for attaining benefits to the consumers that exceed the effects of restricting the freedom of competition. This shall be done in accordance with the regulations and procedures set out by the Executive Regulation of this Law.
 
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 00:58, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 04:58, 8 October 2007

Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry

Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator). Does this sound like obstacles to entry language? Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.

Article 3(c) - Dominant Position: the position allowing a company to hold, on the market in question, a position of economic power which gives him the capacity to make obstacle with the maintenance of an effective competition, by providing him the possibility of independent behaviors in an appreciable measurement with respect to its competitors, of its customers or its suppliers;

--AchalOza 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

Algeria 2000 Tying

One of the criteria for establishing a dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds. Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP? Or should this be nothing since it's just establishing what is a dominant position and doesn't say it's an abusive act? The text below was translated with Google.

Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;

--AchalOza 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering

Article 6(c) - "Coordinating with regard to proceeding or refraining from participating in tenders, auctions, negotiations and other calls for procurement."

--AchalOza 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

Egypt 2005 - Defenses

Article 9

The provisions of this Law shall not apply to public utilities managed by the State.

The Authority may, upon the request of the concerned parties, exempt some or all the acts provided for in articles 6 [on Restrictive Trade Practices], 7 [on Restrictive Trade Practices] and 8 [on Dominance] regarding public utilities that are managed by companies subject to the Private Law where this is in the public interest or for attaining benefits to the consumers that exceed the effects of restricting the freedom of competition. This shall be done in accordance with the regulations and procedures set out by the Executive Regulation of this Law.

--AchalOza 00:58, 8 October 2007 (EDT)