User talk:AchalOza: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Egypt 2005 - Defenses
 
(122 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== El Salvador 1997 ==
== Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry ==


Note to self: find full Spanish texts and translate into English.  Current dataset is built off of secondary sources.
''Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator).  Does this sound like obstacles to entry language?  Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.''


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 09:06, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Article 3(c) - Dominant Position: the position allowing a company to hold, on the market in question, a position of economic power which '''gives him the capacity to make obstacle with the maintenance of an effective competition''', by providing him the possibility of independent behaviors in an appreciable measurement with respect to its competitors, of its customers or its suppliers;


== Hungary 2005 Dom. Efficiency Defense ==
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


Does this sound like an efficiency defense to you guys?
== Algeria 2000 Tying ==


21(h) - "[It shall be prohibited to abuse a dominant position, particularly:] to set extremely low prices '''which are not based on greater efficiency''' in comparison with that of competitors and which are likely to drive out competitors from the relevant market or to hinder their market entry;"
''One of the criteria for establishing a dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds.  Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP?  Or should this be nothing since it's just establishing what is a dominant position and doesn't say it's an abusive act?  The text below was translated with Google.''


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 12:04, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


Talked to Hylton, he said this is predatory pricing.  Moreover, we should keep a running list of statutes that prohibit predatory pricing.  If there are enough, then we should create a new entry for that in the dataset.  For now, we should code it as discriminatory pricing (IS THAT RIGHT?).
== Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering ==


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:09, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
Article 6(c) - "Coordinating with regard to proceeding or refraining from participating in tenders, auctions, negotiations and other calls for procurement."


== Israel 1988 Remedies Available to 3rd Parties ==
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)


''Looks like this article implies 3rd parties may recover monetary damages:''
== Egypt 2005 - Defenses ==


Article 46I(a) - "In the case that a ruling of pecuniary compensation is handed down by a Court in a Class Action, such Court may (1) Instruct whether such compensation is to be paid immediately or within a period determined by the Court"
'''Article 9'''


--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 15:39, 1 July 2007 (EDT)
The provisions of this Law shall not apply to public utilities managed by the State.


The Authority may, upon the request of the concerned parties, exempt some or all the acts provided for in articles 6 [on Restrictive Trade Practices], 7 [on Restrictive Trade Practices] and 8 [on Dominance] regarding public utilities that are managed by companies subject to the Private Law where this is in the public interest or for attaining benefits to the consumers that exceed the effects of restricting the freedom of competition. This shall be done in accordance with the regulations and procedures set out by the Executive Regulation of this Law.


 
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 00:58, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
== South Korea 2004 Divestures ==
 
''This sounds like divesture language:''
 
Art. 21 - "Where an enterpriser commits any activity violating the provisions of Article 19, Paragraph 1, the Fair Trade '''Commission may order enterpriser to discontinue the act, publicly announce the fact of receiving corrective order, or take other corrective measures'''."

Latest revision as of 04:58, 8 October 2007

Algeria 2003 Obstacles to Entry

Below is Algeria's definition of dominance (using Google Translator). Does this sound like obstacles to entry language? Perhaps we should have a translator look at it.

Article 3(c) - Dominant Position: the position allowing a company to hold, on the market in question, a position of economic power which gives him the capacity to make obstacle with the maintenance of an effective competition, by providing him the possibility of independent behaviors in an appreciable measurement with respect to its competitors, of its customers or its suppliers;

--AchalOza 08:01, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

Algeria 2000 Tying

One of the criteria for establishing a dominant position includes being able to create advantageous contractual bonds. Would this just be another abusive act prohibition, or tying under RTP? Or should this be nothing since it's just establishing what is a dominant position and doesn't say it's an abusive act? The text below was translated with Google.

Article 2 - The criteria of determination of the dominant position of an economic agent on a market or a market segment of goods or services are in particular: financial, contractual bonds or in fact which bind the economic agent to one or more economic agents and which get advantages of any nature to him;

--AchalOza 08:08, 11 September 2007 (EDT)

Egypt 2005 - Collusive Tendering

Article 6(c) - "Coordinating with regard to proceeding or refraining from participating in tenders, auctions, negotiations and other calls for procurement."

--AchalOza 00:49, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

Egypt 2005 - Defenses

Article 9

The provisions of this Law shall not apply to public utilities managed by the State.

The Authority may, upon the request of the concerned parties, exempt some or all the acts provided for in articles 6 [on Restrictive Trade Practices], 7 [on Restrictive Trade Practices] and 8 [on Dominance] regarding public utilities that are managed by companies subject to the Private Law where this is in the public interest or for attaining benefits to the consumers that exceed the effects of restricting the freedom of competition. This shall be done in accordance with the regulations and procedures set out by the Executive Regulation of this Law.

--AchalOza 00:58, 8 October 2007 (EDT)