Japan 2005: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: '''Score = 17''' ''Governed by:'' Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade: Law No. 54 of 1947 (as amended in 2005) (hereinafter referred to as ...
 
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 17'''
'''Score = 16'''


''Governed by:'' Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade: Law No. 54 of 1947 (as amended in 2005) (hereinafter referred to as “Fair Trade Act”)  
''Governed by:'' Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade: Law No. 54 of 1947 (as amended in 2005) (hereinafter referred to as “Fair Trade Act”)  
<ref>A comprehensive listing of relevant statutes can be found here, http://www.jftc.go.jp/e-page/legislation/index.html</ref>
<ref>A comprehensive listing of relevant statutes can be found at: http://www.jftc.go.jp/e-page/legislation/index.html</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"

Latest revision as of 22:03, 21 April 2009

Score = 16

Governed by: Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade: Law No. 54 of 1947 (as amended in 2005) (hereinafter referred to as “Fair Trade Act”) [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 0
Remedies Fines 1 §89 allows the Commission to impose fines for violations of the FTA.
Prison Sentences 1 §89 allows the Commission to impose imprisonment for violations of the FTA.
Divestitures 1 §7(1) of the FTA allows the Commission to divide up private monopolies.
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 §45 says that any person can report a violation to the Commission and ask for appropriate measures to be taken.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 §24 gives injured 3rd parties the right to demand a suspension of the infringements of the FTA and collect damages after the conclusion of the hearing.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 §15(2) requires pre merger notification for all proposed mergers.
Pre-merger 2 §15(2) requires pre merger notification for all proposed mergers.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 §9 prohibits any merger that may cause an excessive concentration of economic power.
Restriction of Competition 1 §15(1) prohibits mergers that have the effect of substantially restraining competition.
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 0
Abusive Acts 1 §2(9) lists unjustly using one’s position as an unfair trade practice.
Price Setting 1 §2(9) lists price setting as an unfair trade practice.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 §2(9) lists discriminatory pricing as an unfair trade practice.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 0
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 §2(6) lists price fixing as an unreasonable restraint of trade.
Tying 0
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 §2(6) lists output restraint in its definition of unreasonable restraints of trade.
Market Sharing 0
Eliminating Competitors 0
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 0
Supply Refusal 0
Efficiency Defense 0

References

  1. A comprehensive listing of relevant statutes can be found at: http://www.jftc.go.jp/e-page/legislation/index.html