User talk:JWSchneider: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
861 edits
No edit summary
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== UK 1998 - Imprisonment ==
== Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing ==


''I doubt we count this''
''What do we think about this one?''


43. - (1) A person is guilty of an offence if, '''having been required
imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms.
to produce a document under section 26, 27 or 28'''-
(a) he intentionally or recklessly destroys or otherwise
disposes of it, falsifies it or conceals it, or
(b) he causes or permits its destruction, disposal,
falsification or concealment.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable-
(a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the
statutory maximum;
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term
not exceeding two years or to a fine or to both.


--[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 17:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT)


Agreed, that doesn't count as imprisonment for our purposes.  --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 06:53, 19 July 2007 (EDT)


== UK 1998 - Merger notification post-merger ==


''If we mark a country as having a voluntary merger regime, do they automatically get a 1 for post-merger?''
== Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors ==


--[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 17:41, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
''Count it?''


== Ukraine 2001 - Merger assessment efficiency defense ==
Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same.


''I think this counts.''
--[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 
2. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine may authorise concentration which was not permitted by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine because the concentration did not correspond with the conditions provided for by Part 1 of the present Article if a positive effect produced by the concentration on the public interests outweighs negative consequences of the restriction of competition.
 
--[[User:JWSchneider|JWSchneider]] 18:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
 
== Uruguay - Misc ==
 
''No primary source could be found.''

Latest revision as of 00:14, 2 August 2007

Saudia Arabia 2004 - Tying or discriminatory pricing

What do we think about this one?

imposing certain conditions on selling and purchasing transactions or on dealing with another firm, in a manner that puts it in a weak competitive position compared to other competing firms.

--JWSchneider 15:18, 31 July 2007 (EDT)


Saudi Arabia 2004 - Eliminating Competitors

Count it?

Article 4(4) - Preventing any firm from exercising its right to enter or move out of the market at any time or hampering the same.

--JWSchneider 15:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://antitrustworldwiki.com/antitrustwiki/index.php?title=User_talk:JWSchneider&oldid=1319"