Honduras 2006: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| Merger Notification | | Merger Notification | ||
| Voluntary | | Voluntary | ||
| | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Mandatory | | Mandatory | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | Article 13 requires mandatory notification of intended concentrations although prior verification is generally voluntary. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| Pre-merger | | Pre-merger | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Article | | Article 13 requires notification to be pre-merger. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 20:44, 8 July 2008
Score = 19
Governed by: The Law for the Defense and Promotion of Competition, Decree no. 527-2005 of November 26, 2005, entered into force in January 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”)[1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | Article 4[2] states that the scope of the law extends to those whose activities have an effect within the national territory of Honduras. |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Articles 37-39, 41 deal with fines. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 1 | Article 19(1) allows total or partial divestitures of improper mergers. | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Article 49 allows outside parties to file complaints with the authority. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Article 58 allows all concerned parties to seek damages through civil actions. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 | ||
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | Article 13 requires mandatory notification of intended concentrations although prior verification is generally voluntary. | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | Article 13 requires notification to be pre-merger. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Article 25(2) mandates that market power and degree of concentration be taken into account when determining which concentrations shall be challenged or sanctioned. |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | Article 19 prohibits mergers that have the effect of impeding competition. | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 1 | Article 19 allows for an efficiency defense if the concentration would yield certain benefits like increasing the production or distribution of goods and services, promoting technical or economic progress or driving the competitive development of an industry or sector. | |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 14(5) prohibits “unilateral action consisting in refusing to sell or provide, to certain persons, goods or services.” |
| Abusive Acts | 0 | ||
| Price Setting | 1 | Article 11(1) prohibits prices setting. | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 8(7) of the Monopoly Decree of 1998 prohibited discriminatory pricing.[3] Article 14 of the Competition Act prohibits general discriminatory practices. | |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | Article 14(2) prohibits resale price maintenance | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | Article 14(7) prohibits predatory actions taken to prevent a potential competitor from entering the market. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 4-A allows for a defense if the act, agreement, partnership, association or contract gives rise to increased economic efficiency and is not detrimental to the consumer. | |
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 11(1) of the Act prohibits price fixing. |
| Tying | 1 | Article 14(3) prohibits tying arrangements. | |
| Market Division | 1 | Article 11(3) prohibits market division. | |
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 11(2) prohibits output restraint. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | Article 14(1) prohibits market sharing. | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Article 14(7) prohibits predatory actions taken to squeeze a competitor out of a market. | |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Article 11(4) prohibits bid rigging. | |
| Supply Refusal | 0 | ||
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 4-A allows for a defense if the act, agreement, partnership, association or contract gives rise to increased economic efficiency and is not detrimental to the consumer. |
References
- ↑ Own translation of Competition Act, as available at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTLAWJUSTICE/EXTCOMPLEGALDB/0,,contentMDK:21326341~pagePK:2137398~piPK:64581526~theSitePK:2137348,00.html; for secondary source analysis in English, see http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTLAWJUSTICE/EXTCOMPLEGALDB/0,,contentMDK:21326314~menuPK:2137514~pagePK:2137398~piPK:64581526~theSitePK:2137348,00.html
- ↑ all references are to the Competition Act unless otherwise indicated
- ↑ http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCOMPLEGALDB/Resources/500.pdf