User talk:Kajrozga: Difference between revisions
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
--[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 11:57, 25 June 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 11:57, 25 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Cote d'Ivoire (1991) == | == Cote d'Ivoire (1991) == | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 25 June 2007
Test (Date) Section
Question
Text
--Kajrozga 11:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Cyprus (1999)
1.)
42.-(1) Where the Commission exercises the powers granted under section 41 and subject to the provisions of section 47, it may, following a study of the relevant reports of the Service, order the dissolution or partial dissolution of a concentration, in order to secure the restoration of the competitive market.
Divestiture = 1 ???
Agreed, this is divestiture. --JWSchneider 15:06, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
2.)
4.—(1) Any enterprise agreement having as its object or effect the elimination, restriction or distortion of competition, in particular an agreement which— . . .
RTP: Eliminating Competitors = 1 ???
--Kajrozga 11:46, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Agreed. This is eliminating competitors. --JWSchneider 15:06, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Czech Republic (2004)
1.)
Article 18
Suspension of implementation of concentrations
(2) Where the Office finds that the undertakings have implemented the concentration without notification of the concentration, it may impose on the undertakings a duty to sell the interests, transfer the enterprise acquired by the concentration or a part thereof, terminate an agreement or take any other measures that may be necessary for restoring effective competition in the relevant market.
Divestiture = 1????
--Kajrozga 11:57, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
Cote d'Ivoire (1991)
From a secondary source: SECTION 2: DESCRIPTION OF PRACTICES, ACTIONS AND BEHAVIOUR SUBJECT TO REVIEW
Ivorian legislation distinguishes between practices which result from individual behaviour (restrictive practices) and those which arise from concerted actions (anti-competitive practices).
1. CONCERTED OR ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES
There is a blanket ban on these practices, but exemption may be granted under article 10 in the case of those which arise from the application of a law or regulation or which would generate economic progress for the community as a whole
---Question 1: Seems like this Article 10 efficiency defense only applies to RTPs. Is that how you guys would read it?---
1.1. Agreements (article 7 L)
Article 7 defines agreements as accords, concerted practices and decisions to associate or collective recommendations emanating from natural or legal persons, public or private.
This article prohibits any concerted action, agreement, alliance or arrangement, express or tacit, which has the purpose of or may have the effect of hampering or limiting free competition, in particular when the action tends to: . . .
---Question 2: RTP: Eliminating Competitors = 1 ????---
--Kajrozga 13:15, 25 June 2007 (EDT)