User talk:JWSchneider

Jamaica 2001 - 3rd party remedies

Does this count?

48. (1) Every person who engages in conduct which constitutes— (a) a contravention of any of the obligations or prohibitions imposed in Parts III, IV, VI or VII; (b) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the contravention of any such provision; (c) inducing by treats, promises, or otherwise the contravention of any such provision; (d) being knowingly conceived in or party to any such contravention; or (e) conspiring with any other person to contravene any such provision, is liable in damages for any loss caused to any other person by such conduct. (2) An action under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within three years from the time when the cause of action arose.

I'd double check with hylton, though i agree with you. --Kajrozga 12:58, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

Jersey, Channel Islands - Generally

This is not a recognized country by the US state department. It's an independent - non-European, non-British - nation, owned by the English Crown.

Jersey, Channel Islands - Merger public interest defense

Efficiency? Public interest?

23 Exemption by Committee on grounds of public policy (Part 4) (1) The Committee may, after consulting the Authority, exempt a merger or acquisition of a type prescribed by an Order made under Article 20(3) from the requirement that it be approved by the Authority before execution. (2) The Committee shall not do so unless it is has satisfied itself that there are exceptional and compelling reasons of public policy that make it desirable to do so. (3) When, in accordance with paragraph (1), the Committee consults the Authority on a proposed exemption – (a) the Authority must publish the advice it gives to the Committee; and (b) the Committee must publish its reasons for granting or refusing to grant the exemption, as the case may be.

--JWSchneider 16:09, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

The rule we're using is default to efficiency defense unless the statute explicitly talks about "public interest", right? I think "public policy" is close enough to "public interest" to make this a public interest defense, but you should probably ask Hylton.

--AchalOza 09:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Norway 1993 - Dominance and price setting

Counts?

Section 3-1 Prohibition of collaboration and influence on prices, markups and discounts Two or more undertakings must not, in connection with the sale of goods or services by agreement or concerted practices, or by any other conduct liable to influence competition, fix or seek to influence prices, markups or discounts except for normal cash discounts. By "normal cash discounts" is meant discounts in connection with cash payment or payment within 30 days. A rate of over 3 per cent shall in no case be regarded as a normal cash discount.

Likewise, one or more suppliers must not fix or seek to influence prices, discounts or markups for the recipients' sale of goods or services.