Russia (October 22, 2002): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
New page: '''Score = 22''' ''Governed by:'' Law on Competition and Restriction of Monopoly Activity on the Commodity Markets’ No. 948-1 of 22 March 1991 last amended 22 October 2002 (hereinafter ...
 
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 22'''
'''Score = 21'''


''Governed by:'' Law on Competition and Restriction of Monopoly Activity on the Commodity Markets’ No. 948-1 of 22 March 1991 last amended 22 October 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  
''Governed by:'' Law on Competition and Restriction of Monopoly Activity on the Commodity Markets’ No. 948-1 of 22 March 1991 last amended 22 October 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  

Revision as of 13:26, 12 October 2007

Score = 21

Governed by: Law on Competition and Restriction of Monopoly Activity on the Commodity Markets’ No. 948-1 of 22 March 1991 last amended 22 October 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 The Competition Law applies to operations performed outside Russian which have led to the limitation of competition or affects markets in Russia.
Remedies Fines 1 Fines are imposed for certain violations.
Prison Sentences 1 For certain monopolistic violations the court can impose prison sentences.
Divestitures 1 Judicial liquidation is a punishment for certain violations.
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Legislation can be initiated by commercial and non-commercial 3rd parties.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Companies that violate the Act can be held responsible for the damages their actions caused to other undertakings.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 The Authority must be notified of mergers.
Pre-merger 0
Post-merger 1 Notification must come within 45 days of the merger.
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 The key factors in deciding whether to allow a merger are whether it will strengthen or create a dominant position or restrict competition.
Restriction of Competition 1 The key factors in deciding whether to allow a merger are whether it will strengthen or create a dominant position or restrict competition.
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 1 Limiting the goods on the market but a dominant undertaking is considered an abusive act.
Abusive Acts 1 Abuses of a dominant position are expressly forbidden by the act.
Price Setting 1 Price setting is considered an abusive act.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Discriminatory conditions are considered an abusive act.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 1 Creating obstacles to entry is considered an abusive act.
Efficiency Defense 1 The act provides exemptions when the economic and social benefit outweighs the detriment to competition.
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Price fixing is impermissible.
Tying 0
Market Division 1 Market division is prohibited.
Output Restraint 1 Refusing to fulfill contracts is prohibited.
Market Sharing 0
Eliminating Competitors 1 Removing others from the market is prohibited.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Bid rigging is prohibited.
Supply Refusal 0
Efficiency Defense 1 The Act allows an exemption when the activity has a social or economic benefit that outweighs the detriment.

References

  1. Full text of the Act was unavailable in English and thus information is taken from excerpts from the Global Competition Review website, http://www.globalcompetitionreview.com/ear/russia.cfm.