Burkina Faso 1994: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JWSchneider (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
JWSchneider (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''Governed by:'' Loi 15/94 du mai 1994 portant organisation de la concurrence au Burkina Faso. | ''Governed by:'' Loi 15/94 du mai 1994 portant organisation de la concurrence au Burkina Faso. | ||
<ref> | <ref>Citation to statute source.</ref> | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Extraterritoriality | | Extraterritoriality | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| | | comm | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| 0 | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| 0 | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| 0 | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
| 0 | | 0 | ||
| | | | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations. | | Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations. | ||
|- class="categorydivision" | |- class="categorydivision" | ||
| Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations. | | Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations. | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 20 June 2007
Score = 15
Governed by: Loi 15/94 du mai 1994 portant organisation de la concurrence au Burkina Faso. [1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | comm
|
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.
|
| Prison Sentences | 1 | Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.
| |
| Divestitures | 0 |
| |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
|
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
| |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 |
| |
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 |
|
| Mandatory | 0 |
| |
| Pre-merger | 0 |
| |
| Post-merger | 0 |
| |
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 0 |
|
| Restriction of Competition | 0 |
| |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 |
| |
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 |
| |
| Other | 0 |
| |
| Efficiency | 0 |
| |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from limiting access to the market.
|
| Abusive Acts | 1 | Article 6 prohibits abusive acts by dominant firms.
| |
| Price Setting | 1 | Article 6 prohibits setting prices
| |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from discriminatory pricing.
| |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | Article 9 prohibits RPM
| |
| Obstacles to Entry | 0 |
| |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations.
| |
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 1 prohibits setting prices
|
| Tying | 1 | Article 14 prohibits tying.
| |
| Market Division | 1 | Article 5 prohibits market division.
| |
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 5 prohibits output restraint
| |
| Market Sharing | 0 |
| |
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Article 5 prohibits limiting the exercise of competition by other companies.
| |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 0 |
| |
| Supply Refusal | 0 |
| |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations.
|
References
- ↑ Citation to statute source.