Vietnam (July 1, 2005): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Remedies | | Remedies | ||
| Fines | | Fines | ||
| | | 1 | ||
| | | The Competition Commission may impose fines. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| | | | ||
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | | Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | ||
| | | 1 | ||
| | | Compensation may have to be paid to thsoe who have suffered loss. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 19 July 2007
Score = 0
Governed by: Competition Law of 4 November 2004 (came into force 1 July 2005) (herein referred to as "Competition Law").[1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 0 | The Competition Law regulates unhealthy competitive practices and practices in restraint of competition by all businesses in Vietnam, including 'overseas enterprises operating in Vietnam.' |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | The Competition Commission may impose fines. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 1 | Divestitures can be requires for unlawful economic mergers. | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Any party that believes its legal rights and interests have been infringed due to a breach of the Competition Law can submit a complaint to the Competition Commission. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Compensation may have to be paid to thsoe who have suffered loss. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 | ||
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | If the parties to a merger have a combined market share of between 30% and 50% of the relevant market, they must notify the Competition Commission 30 days before the proposed merger. | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | If the parties to a merger have a combined market share of between 30% and 50% of the relevant market, they must notify the Competition Commission 30 days before the proposed merger. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Mergers resulting in greater than 50% market share are prohibited |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | Restriction of competition through a merger is defined by the Competition Law as a practice that reduces, distorts, or hinders competition in the market. | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 1 | The Competition Commission may grant a business failure exemption if one or more of the parties to the merger is at risk of being dissolved or declared bankrupt. | |
| Efficiency | 1 | The Competition Commission may grant an exemption if the merger has the effect of contributing to socioeconomic development, technical progress or the increase of exports. | |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 0 | |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | An enterprise in a monopoly market position may not impose disadvantageous conditions on customers or abuse its monopoly position to unilaterally change or rescind a signed contract without a legitimate reason. | |
| Price Setting | 1 | The Competition Law prohibits fixed unreasonable selling or purchasing prices. Moreover, it prohibits predatory pricing as well. | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 0 | ||
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | The Competition Law prohibits a dominant firm from fixing minimum reselling prices. | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | The Competition Law prohibits a single enterprise or a group of enterprises from preventing other enterprises from entering the market. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 0 | ||
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Enterprises that hold a combined market share of 30 percent or more of the relevant market are prohibited from entering into price fixing agreements. |
| Tying | 1 | The Competition Law prohibits a single enterprise or a group of enterprises from bundling unrelated obligations into a contract. | |
| Market Division | 0 | ||
| Output Restraint | 1 | Enterprises that hold a combined market share of 30 percent or more of the relevant market are prohibited from entering into output restraint agreements. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | Enterprises that hold a combined market share of 30 percent or more of the relevant market are prohibited from entering into market sharing agreements. | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Boycotts are considered agreements in restraint of competition and are strictly prohibited. | |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Tender collusions are considered agreements in restraint of competition and are strictly prohibited. | |
| Supply Refusal | 0 | ||
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | The Competition Commission may grant an exemption for an agreement in restraint of competition if the agreement increases efficiency. |
References
- ↑ A primary source could not be located, instead a secondary source was used: http://www.freshfields.com/practice/comptrade/publications/pdf/10388.pdf