Zambia 1994: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 19'''
'''Score = 20'''


''Governed by:'' The Competition and Fair Trading Act Chapter 417 of the Laws of Zambia of 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  
''Governed by:'' The Competition and Fair Trading Act Chapter 417 of the Laws of Zambia of 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).  
Line 77: Line 77:
| Merger Assessment
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| Dominance
| 0
| 1
|  
| Dominance is considered by the Zambian Competition Commission<ref>ZCC internal report, http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/media/library/conference_4th_bonn_2005/Paper_presented_George_Lipimilef.pdf</ref>
|-
|-
Line 89: Line 89:
|  
|  
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| 0
| 1
|  
| A merger may be allowed to go forward if it "leads to more efficient use of resources,
enhanced product portfolio and elaborate consumer choice."<ref>''Id.''</ref>
 
|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 107: Line 108:
|  
|  
| Efficiency
| Efficiency
| 0
| 1
|  
| The ZCC will consider an efficiency defense.<ref>''Id.''</ref>
|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"

Revision as of 20:16, 23 July 2007

Score = 20

Governed by: The Competition and Fair Trading Act Chapter 417 of the Laws of Zambia of 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 7(1) says that the Article 7 prohibitions apply to anything that has an effect on competition in Zambia.
Remedies Fines 1 Article 8 imposes large fines and imprisonment for merging without permission.
Prison Sentences 1 Article 8 imposes large fines and imprisonment for merging without permission.
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 0
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 0
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Article 8(1) requires notification of mergers before they occur.[2]
Pre-merger 2 Article 8(1) requires notification of mergers before they occur.[3]
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Dominance is considered by the Zambian Competition Commission[4]
Restriction of Competition 1 The Commission looks at the effects of the merger on competition.
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 A merger may be allowed to go forward if it "leads to more efficient use of resources,

enhanced product portfolio and elaborate consumer choice."[5]

Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 1 The ZCC will consider an efficiency defense.[6]
Dominance Limits Access 0
Abusive Acts 1 Article 7 prohibits several abusive acts by dominant undertakings.
Price Setting 1 Article 7(2)(a) prohibits cost pricing.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 7(2)(b) prohibits discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 7 prohibits acts that create obstacles to entry.
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 9(3)(a) prohibits price fixing.
Tying 1 Article 7(1) prohibits "agreeing to make contracts subject to unrelated conditions."[7]
Market Division 1 Article 9(3)(c) prohibits market or customer allocation agreements.
Output Restraint 0
Market Sharing 1 Article 9(3)(d) prohibits allocation by quota as to sales an production.
Eliminating Competitors 0
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 9(3)(b) prohibits collusive tendering.
Supply Refusal 1 Article 9(3)(f) prohibits supply refusals.
Efficiency Defense 0

References