User talk:AchalOza: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Yugoslavia 1996 Divestitures ==
''Divestitures?''
Article 6(1) - "When the Anti-Monopoly Commission finds that an economic agent has misused its monopolistic or
dominant position on the market or concluded a monopolistic accord, it shall render a decision
ordering the economic agent concerned '''to take appropriate steps towards eliminating the established
irregularities or deficiencies'''."
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 16:49, 19 July 2007 (EDT)
Based on Hylton's comments re: Venezuela, this is not sufficient for divestiture.  --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 20:30, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
== Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing ==
== Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing ==



Revision as of 12:13, 24 July 2007

Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing

Looks like predatory pricing:

Article 17 - "[The following is a prohibited act:] the sale at a loss. [It is] regarded as sale at a loss, any resale in the state of goods or products at a price lower than its effective purchase price."

--AchalOza 06:50, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing Defense

The statute seems to allow a type of efficiency defense for predatory pricing, however they do not have a broader dominance efficiency defense. How should I code this, I'm leaning towards as a comment to price setting.

Article 17 - "[The following] are not aimed by this measurement [prohibiting predatory pricing]: (1) resale of non durable products since they are threatened of fast detoriation; (2) voluntary or forced resale, moved by the suspension or the change of a commercial activity."

--AchalOza 06:53, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Hylton: do not include this as an efficiency defense, instead just mention it as a comment in price setting. --AchalOza 13:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)