|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing ==
| |
|
| |
|
| ''Looks like predatory pricing:''
| |
|
| |
| Article 17 - "[The following is a prohibited act:] the sale at a loss. [It is] regarded as sale at a loss, any resale in the state of goods or products at a price lower than its effective purchase price."
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 06:50, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Mali 1992 Predatory Pricing Defense ==
| |
|
| |
| ''The statute seems to allow a type of efficiency defense for predatory pricing, however they do not have a broader dominance efficiency defense. How should I code this, I'm leaning towards as a comment to price setting.''
| |
|
| |
| Article 17 - "[The following] are not aimed by this measurement [prohibiting predatory pricing]: (1) resale of non durable products since they are threatened of fast detoriation; (2) voluntary or forced resale, moved by the suspension or the change of a commercial activity."
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 06:53, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Hylton: do not include this as an efficiency defense, instead just mention it as a comment in price setting. --[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:41, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
| |