Slovak Republic (27 February 2001): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
New page: '''Score = 28''' ''Governed by:'' 136/2001 Coll. Act of 27 February 2001 on Protection of Competition and on Amendments and Supplements to the Act of the Slovak National Council NO. 347/1...
 
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 1
| 1
| Article 25(2) says that 3rd parties can initiate proceedings by a written petition.
| Article 25(2) allows third party to initiate a Commission proceeding through a written petition.


|-
|-

Revision as of 22:09, 12 August 2007

Score = 28

Governed by: 136/2001 Coll. Act of 27 February 2001 on Protection of Competition and on Amendments and Supplements to the Act of the Slovak National Council NO. 347/1990 Coll. On Organization of Ministries and Other Central Bodies of State Administration of the Slovak Republic as amended (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).[1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 2(4) says that the Act may apply to activities abroad if they affect the domestic market.
Remedies Fines 1 Article 38 provides guidelines for fining.
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 1 Article 7 of Council Regulation No 1/2003 allows for structural remedies
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Article 25(2) allows third party to initiate a Commission proceeding through a written petition.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Article 42 says that injured consumers can demand remedies in civil courts.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 1 Article 27 requires the Authority to allow 3rd parties to participate if they so request.
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Article 7(1) of CR 139/2004 requires notification[2]
Pre-merger 2 Article 7(1) of 139/2004 requires pre-clearance
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Article 2(1) of CR 139/2004 considers dominance
Restriction of Competition 1 Article 2(1)(a) of CR 139/2004 considers effect on competition in the market
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 Article 2(1)(b) of CR 139/2004 considers the development of technical and economic progress
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 1 Article 2(1)(b) of CR 139/2004 considers the interests of intermediate and ultimate consumers
Other 0
Efficiency 1 Article 2(4) of CR 139/2004 allows an efficiency defense
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 82(b) prohibits limiting access
Abusive Acts 1 Article 82 prohibits abuse of a dominant position
Price Setting 1 Article 82(a) prohibits price setting
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Articles 81(1)(d), 82(c) prohibit discriminatory conditions
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Article 81 prohibits minimum resale price restrictions[3]
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 82 prohibits anti-competitive pricing schemes[4]
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 81(1)(a) prohibits price fixing
Tying 1 Articles 81(1)(e), 82(d) prohibit tying
Market Division 1 Article 81 prohibits customer allocation clauses[5]
Output Restraint 1 Article 81(1)(b) prohibits limiting production
Market Sharing 1 Article 81(1)(c) prohibits market sharing
Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 81(1) prohibits agreements that have the purpose or effect of eliminating competition
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 81 prohibits bid-rigging
Supply Refusal 1 Article 81(1)(b) prohibits supply refusal
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 81(3) allows an efficiency defense

References

  1. Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic website, http://www.antimon.gov.sk/eng/?c=356.
  2. The new merger notification guidelines implemented by Council Regulation 139/2004 give undertakings the ability to request exemption from notification requirements. However, because a formal request must be submitted and approved in order to gain exemption, the new notification guidelines are encoded as requiring mandatory pre-merger notification.
  3. EC Competition Law, at 97.
  4. Id, at 283.
  5. Id, at 97.