User talk:AchalOza: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Armenia 2000 Output Restraint
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Line 45: Line 45:
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:18, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:18, 21 June 2007 (EDT)


== Armenia 2000 Output Restraint ==
== Armenia 2000 Output Restraint and Big-Rigging ==


Would this include output restraint?
Would this include output restraint and big-rigging?


Article 5.  Anti-competitive Agreements and Prohibition of Anti-competitive Agreements  
Article 5.  Anti-competitive Agreements and Prohibition of Anti-competitive Agreements  
Line 54: Line 54:
concluded between economic entities or their concerted practices (hereinafter referred to as   
concluded between economic entities or their concerted practices (hereinafter referred to as   
“agreements”), which might result in the restriction, prevention, prohibition of competition.  These are the . . . (b) '''artificial increase, decrease or  maintenance  of prices''' on the commodity markets;
“agreements”), which might result in the restriction, prevention, prohibition of competition.  These are the . . . (b) '''artificial increase, decrease or  maintenance  of prices''' on the commodity markets;
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 13:32, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:32, 21 June 2007

Austria 2000 Divestures

I think this should be coded as a divesture:

§35(2) - "The Cartel Court . . . [shall] in addition also order [the group] to take measures by which the market-dominating position will be weakened or eliminated, if: (a) the undertaking has repeatedly abused its market-dominating position; (b) the abuses may impair media diversity; and (c) it is expected that, without such measures, further abuses of this type will occur."

--AchalOza 11:02, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Albania 2002 Pre-Merger Notification

This sounds like a pre-merger notification requirement:

Art. 14(1) - "A concentration, under article 10, shall not be put into effect either: a) before its notification nearby the Authority or b) until it has been authorized by the Authority, or c) until conditions attached to the authorization are fulfilled."

--AchalOza 12:53, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Albania 2002 Public Interest Pro-D

Does this sound like a public interest (or efficiency) defense to you?

2. Commission may not prohibit concentrations where one of the undertakings risks seriously a failure, there is no less anti­competitive alternative to the concentration, when:

a) this undertaking is in such a situation that without the concentration it would exit the market in the near future;

b) there is no serious prospects of re­organizing the activity of this undertaking.

--AchalOza 12:57, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Armenia 2000 Extraterritoriality

Sounds to me like the scope extends to foreign companies that have an effect on Armenia:

Article 2. The Subject Governed by the Law

1. The present Law shall apply to those activities and conduct of economic entities, government and local government administration bodies, which might result in the restriction, prevention and distortion of competition or in acts of unfair competition, except where otherwise stipulated by law.

--AchalOza 13:18, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Armenia 2000 Output Restraint and Big-Rigging

Would this include output restraint and big-rigging?

Article 5. Anti-competitive Agreements and Prohibition of Anti-competitive Agreements

1. In the context of the present Law, anti-competitive agreements are contracts and agreements concluded between economic entities or their concerted practices (hereinafter referred to as “agreements”), which might result in the restriction, prevention, prohibition of competition. These are the . . . (b) artificial increase, decrease or maintenance of prices on the commodity markets;

--AchalOza 13:32, 21 June 2007 (EDT)