Syria, 2008: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
HCargill (talk | contribs)
Coded 2008.
HCargill (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Score = 23'''
'''Score = 23'''


''Governed by: Law on Competition and the Prevention of Monopoly (Law 7 of 2008)<ref>law available in Arabic from the ''Carnegie Endowment for International Peace'' and ''The Syria Report,'' at http://www.syria-report.com/doc/Competition_and_Anti-Trust_Law.pdf - Google translate was used to translate the statute into English.</ref> ("the statute")''  
''Governed by: Law on Competition and the Prevention of Monopoly (Law 7 of 2008)<ref>law available in Arabic from the ''Carnegie Endowment for International Peace'' and ''The Syria Report,'' at http://www.syria-report.com/doc/Competition_and_Anti-Trust_Law.pdf - Google translate was used to translate the statute into English.</ref> ("the statute").''  


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"

Revision as of 19:11, 17 July 2008

Score = 23

Governed by: Law on Competition and the Prevention of Monopoly (Law 7 of 2008)[1] ("the statute").

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 3(D) of the statute states that it applies to extraterritorial activities which affect the Syrian market.
Remedies Fines 1 Articles 23(A) and (B) provide for fines.
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 1 Article 14(A)(3) provides for divestitures of certain mergers.
Private Enforcement Third Party Initiation 1 Article 17 permits consumers and Chambers of Commerce to ask the council to investigate violations.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Art. 26 affords injured third parties a civil action.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 1 Article 10D says that interested third parties may submit writings to the Ministers on proposed mergers.
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Article 9(B) provides for mandatory, pre-merger notification for certain mergers.
Pre-merger 2 Article 9(B) provides for mandatory, pre-merger notification for certain mergers.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Articles 9(A) and (B) state that strengthening a dominant position is a factor in merger analysis
Restriction of Competition 1 Articles 9(A) and (B) state that the effects on competition are considerations in merger analysis
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 Article 14(A)(1) states that a merger may be allowed if there are public interest justifications for it.
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 1 Article 14(A)(1) states that a efficiency considerations may play a role in deciding to grant a merger.
Dominance Limits Access 0
Abusive Acts 1 Article 6 bans abuse of a dominant position
Price Setting 1 Article 6(A) bans price setting.


Discriminatory Pricing 1 Articles 6(C) and 8(A)(2) ban discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Articles 6(B) and 8(A)(1) ban resale price maintenance.
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 6 bans the creation of obstacles to entry
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 7(B) allows for otherwise prohibited practices if they contribute to efficiency.
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 5(1) bans price fixing
Tying 0
Market Division 1 Article 5(3) bans market division.
Output Restraint 1 Article 5(4) bans output restraint.
Market Sharing 0
Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 5(5) and 5(7) disallow eliminating competitors
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 5(2) bans bid-rigging.
Supply Refusal 1 Article 5(6) bans agreements refusing to supply.
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 5(c) provides for an efficiency defense of otherwise prohibited practices. .

References

  1. law available in Arabic from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and The Syria Report, at http://www.syria-report.com/doc/Competition_and_Anti-Trust_Law.pdf - Google translate was used to translate the statute into English.