User talk:AchalOza: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:
Tough to tell who is getting the $$ w/out the context. How do you know this covers 3rd parties?   
Tough to tell who is getting the $$ w/out the context. How do you know this covers 3rd parties?   
--[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 18:58, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 18:58, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
== South Korea 2004 Divestitures ==
''This sounds like divestiture language:''
Art. 21 - "Where an enterpriser commits any activity violating the provisions of Article 19, Paragraph 1, the Fair Trade '''Commission may order enterpriser to discontinue the act, publicly announce the fact of receiving corrective order, or take other corrective measures'''."
Note: they have a similar "corrective measures" provision for most of the prohibitions they list.
--[[User:AchalOza|AchalOza]] 07:40, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
I like the public shaming provision.  Not sure if this is divestiture, though.  Sounds more like an injunction to not do the act. Ask hylton.
--[[User:Kajrozga|Kajrozga]] 18:59, 8 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:00, 11 July 2007

Israel 1988 Remedies Available to 3rd Parties

Looks like this article implies 3rd parties may recover monetary damages:

Article 46I(a) - "In the case that a ruling of pecuniary compensation is handed down by a Court in a Class Action, such Court may (1) Instruct whether such compensation is to be paid immediately or within a period determined by the Court"

--AchalOza 15:39, 1 July 2007 (EDT)


Tough to tell who is getting the $$ w/out the context. How do you know this covers 3rd parties? --Kajrozga 18:58, 8 July 2007 (EDT)