Burkina Faso 1994: Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
AchalOza (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
| 1
| 1
|  
|  


|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"
Line 20: Line 19:
| 1
| 1
| Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.  
| Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.  


|-
|-
Line 27: Line 25:
| 1
| 1
| Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.
| Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.


|-
|-
Line 34: Line 31:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  


|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"
Line 41: Line 37:
| 1
| 1
| Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
| Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.


|-
|-
Line 48: Line 43:
| 1
| 1
| Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
| Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
|-
|-
Line 55: Line 49:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  


|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"
Line 62: Line 55:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 69: Line 61:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 76: Line 67:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 83: Line 73:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"
Line 90: Line 79:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 97: Line 85:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 106: Line 92:
|  
|  


|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 112: Line 97:
| 0
| 0
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 120: Line 104:
|  
|  


|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 127: Line 110:
|  
|  


|- class="categorydivision"
|- class="categorydivision"
| Dominance
| Dominance
Line 134: Line 116:
| Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from limiting access to the market.
| Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from limiting access to the market.


|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 140: Line 121:
| 1
| 1
| Article 6 prohibits abusive acts by dominant firms.
| Article 6 prohibits abusive acts by dominant firms.


|-
|-
Line 147: Line 127:
| 1
| 1
| Article 6 prohibits setting prices
| Article 6 prohibits setting prices


|-
|-
Line 155: Line 134:
| Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from discriminatory pricing.
| Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from discriminatory pricing.


|-
|-
|  
|  
Line 162: Line 140:
| Article 9 prohibits RPM
| Article 9 prohibits RPM


|-
|-
|  
|  

Revision as of 19:09, 20 June 2007

Score = 15

Governed by: Loi 15/94 du mai 1994 portant organisation de la concurrence au Burkina Faso. [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1
Remedies Fines 1 Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.
Prison Sentences 1 Articles 53-65 impose fines and imprisonment for violations of the Act.
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Article 52 allows anybody injured by violations to bring a civil suit.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 0
Pre-merger 0
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 0
Restriction of Competition 0
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from limiting access to the market.
Abusive Acts 1 Article 6 prohibits abusive acts by dominant firms.
Price Setting 1 Article 6 prohibits setting prices
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 6 prohibits dominant firms from discriminatory pricing.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Article 9 prohibits RPM
Obstacles to Entry 0


Efficiency Defense 1 Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations.


Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 1 prohibits setting prices


Tying 1 Article 14 prohibits tying.


Market Division 1 Article 5 prohibits market division.


Output Restraint 1 Article 5 prohibits output restraint


Market Sharing 0


Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 5 prohibits limiting the exercise of competition by other companies.


Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 0


Supply Refusal 0


Efficiency Defense 1 Article 8 provides an efficiency defense for article 6 violations.


References

  1. Available at, http://www.artel.bf/Concurrence.html (translation by Sean Miller).