Canada (August 23, 2000): Difference between revisions

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
New page: '''Score = 19''' ''Governed by:'' Competition Act of 23 August 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). <ref>Canadian Competition Bureau website, http://www.competitionbu...
 
Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
| Private Enforcement
| Private Enforcement
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 3rd Party Initiation
| 0
| 1
|  
| §36(1)(a) states that any person who suffered loss due to a violation of §45-§62 can initiate a private suit in any “competent jurisdiction.”


|-
|-
|  
|  
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties
| 0
| 1
|  
| §36(1) provides for monetary remedies to third party initiators.
|-
|-
Line 77: Line 77:
| Merger Assessment
| Merger Assessment
| Dominance
| Dominance
| 0
| 1
|  
| §92 makes market share part of the merger assessment, though not sufficient in itself.
|-
|-
Line 84: Line 84:
| Restriction of Competition
| Restriction of Competition
| 1
| 1
| The Commissioner can issue a remedial order to any merger that is likely to prevent competition.
| §92 allows Tribunal to issue a remedial order to any merger that is likely to prevent competition.
|-
|-
|  
|  
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| Public Interest (Pro D)
| 0
| 1
|  
| §93 allows Tribunal to allow otherwise impermissible merger due to international competitiveness considerations.
|-
|-
Line 101: Line 101:
|  
|  
| Other
| Other
| 0
| 1
|  
| §93 allows Tribunal to consider business failure in merger calculus.
|-
|-
Line 114: Line 114:
| Limits Access
| Limits Access
| 1
| 1
| §77 prohibits market restriction by dominant undertakings.
| §78(e) prohibits “pre-emption of scarce facilities or resources . . .  with the object of withholding the facilities or resources from a market.
|-
|-
Line 137: Line 137:
|  
|  
| Resale Price Maintenance
| Resale Price Maintenance
| 0
| 1
|  
| §61(1) prohibits resale price maintenance.
|-
|-
|  
|  
| Obstacles to Entry
| Obstacles to Entry
| 0
| 1
|  
| §78 prohibits anti-competitive acts that prevent market entry.
|-
|-
Line 155: Line 155:
| Restrictive Trade Practices
| Restrictive Trade Practices
| Price Fixing
| Price Fixing
| 0
| 1
|  
| §45 makes price setting to lessen competition a criminal offense.
|-
|-

Revision as of 16:17, 16 July 2007

Score = 19

Governed by: Competition Act of 23 August 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 §92 gives the Tribunal power over any merger (domestic or foreign) that has an effect in Canada.
Remedies Fines 1 §100 allows fines for failing to notify of a transaction.
Prison Sentences 1 §100 allows the Tribunal to impose imprisonment for failing to notify.
Divestitures 1 §92 allows the Tribunal to dissolve companies formed by impermissible mergers.
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 §36(1)(a) states that any person who suffered loss due to a violation of §45-§62 can initiate a private suit in any “competent jurisdiction.”
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 §36(1) provides for monetary remedies to third party initiators.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 §114 requires pre-merger notification for large mergers.
Pre-merger 2 §114 requires pre-merger notification for large mergers.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 §92 makes market share part of the merger assessment, though not sufficient in itself.
Restriction of Competition 1 §92 allows Tribunal to issue a remedial order to any merger that is likely to prevent competition.
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 §93 allows Tribunal to allow otherwise impermissible merger due to international competitiveness considerations.
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 1 §93 allows Tribunal to consider business failure in merger calculus.
Efficiency 1 §96 contains an exception for mergers that are likely to bring about gains in efficiency.
Dominance Limits Access 1 §78(e) prohibits “pre-emption of scarce facilities or resources . . . with the object of withholding the facilities or resources from a market.”
Abusive Acts 1 §78 and 79 prohibit abuse of a dominant position.
Price Setting 1 §50(1)(b) makes price setting (too low) a criminal offense.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 §50(1)(a) makes discriminatory pricing a criminal offense.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 §61(1) prohibits resale price maintenance.
Obstacles to Entry 1 §78 prohibits anti-competitive acts that prevent market entry.
Efficiency Defense 1 §85-90 allow the Commissioner to take into account gains in efficiency when evaluating the prohibited practices.
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 §45 makes price setting to lessen competition a criminal offense.
Tying 1 §77 prohibits tying arrangements.
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 §45 makes output restraint to lessen competition a criminal offense.
Market Sharing 0
Eliminating Competitors 1 §50(1)(c) makes practices with the effect of eliminating a competitor a criminal offense.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 §47 makes bid rigging a criminal offense.
Supply Refusal 1 §61(6) makes inducing a supply refusal a criminal offense.
Efficiency Defense 1 §85-90 allow the Commissioner to take into account gains in efficiency when evaluating the prohibited practices.

References