User talk:JWSchneider

UK 1998 - Imprisonment

I doubt we count this

43. - (1) A person is guilty of an offence if, having been required to produce a document under section 26, 27 or 28- (a) he intentionally or recklessly destroys or otherwise disposes of it, falsifies it or conceals it, or (b) he causes or permits its destruction, disposal, falsification or concealment. (2) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable- (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine or to both.

--JWSchneider 17:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Agreed, that doesn't count as imprisonment for our purposes. --AchalOza 06:53, 19 July 2007 (EDT)

UK 1998 - Merger notification post-merger

If we mark a country as having a voluntary merger regime, do they automatically get a 1 for post-merger?

--JWSchneider 17:41, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

I don't think so. Post-merger implies that the post-merger notification is necessary, right? So if it's a voluntary merger regime, then even a post-merger notification may not be necessary. We should probably discuss this one with Hylton I guess. --AchalOza 06:55, 19 July 2007 (EDT)

Ukraine 2001 - Merger assessment efficiency defense

I think this counts.

2. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine may authorise concentration which was not permitted by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine because the concentration did not correspond with the conditions provided for by Part 1 of the present Article if a positive effect produced by the concentration on the public interests outweighs negative consequences of the restriction of competition.

--JWSchneider 18:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Uruguay - Misc

No primary source could be found.