Estonia (June 28, 2004)

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Revision as of 03:22, 9 January 2008 by Kajrozga (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Score = 21

Governed by: Competition Act of 5 June 2001 (RT I 2001, 56, 332) entered into force 1 October 2001, last amended 28 June 2004 (RT I 2004, 56, 401) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 §1(2) says that the act applies to activity outside of Estonia that restricts competition in Estonia.
Remedies Fines 1 §62(3) allows the Competition Board to impose fines for un-remedied violations of the Competition Act.
Prison Sentences 1 §79 of the amended 2004 Act allows prison sentences for criminal violations.
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 §63 of the 2004 amendment lists the procedure for filing an application with the Competition Board.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 §78 says that compensation for damages caused by violations of the Act could be dealt with through civil procedure.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0 §67 of the 2001 Act gave interested 3rd parties rights in proceedings however these were repealed in a 2002 amendment (RT I 2002, 82, 480).
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 §25 requires notification of concentrations.
Pre-merger 2 §25 requires that the notification come within one week of one of the enumerated decisive acts.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 §22(2) says that the Competition Board may prohibits a merger if it would strengthen the dominant position.
Restriction of Competition 1 §22(1) lists several factors for consideration of a merger application including many related to restriction of competition (for example, barriers to entry and the resultant market position of the concentration).
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 1 §16(2) lists limiting production and markets as an example of an abusive act.
Abusive Acts 1 §16 prohibits abuse by dominant undertakings.
Price Setting 1 §16(1) lists price setting as an example of an abusive act.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 §16(3) lists applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent agreements as an abusive act.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 0
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 §4(1)(1) prohibits price fixing.
Tying 1 §4(1)(6) prohibits tying arrangements.
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 §4(1)(2) prohibits limiting production and service.
Market Sharing 1 §4(1)(3) prohibits market sharing.
Eliminating Competitors 1 §4(1)(3) prohibits attempts to exclude another person from the market.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 0
Supply Refusal 1 §16(6) prohibits the unjustified refusal to sell or buy goods.
Efficiency Defense 1 §6(2) grants an exception to the §4 prohibitions for companies that contribute to technological and economic progress.

References

  1. Estonian Competition Board website, http://www.konkurentsiamet.ee/?id=10643