Uzbekistan 1996

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Revision as of 17:58, 19 July 2007 by JWSchneider (talk | contribs) (New page: '''Score = 24''' ''Governed by:'' Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Competition and Restriction of Monopolistic Activity at the Markets of 27 December 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Score = 24

Governed by: Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Competition and Restriction of Monopolistic Activity at the Markets of 27 December 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 1 Article 2 says that the Act will apply to activities outside of Uzbekistan that have an effect in the country.
Remedies Fines 1 Article 18 allows the Commission to impose fines for violations of the Act.
Prison Sentences 0
Divestitures 1 Article 16 allows the Commission to impose compulsory divestiture in the case of a dominant undertaking infringing the antimonopoly legislation.
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Article 20 allows other undertakings to make complaints to initiate proceedings.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 1 Article 19 provides a cause of action for damages for injured 3rd parties.
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 0
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 3 Article 14 requires mergers to be approved by the Commission.
Pre-merger 2 Permission for the merger must be received before it can go through so notification must come prior to the merger.
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 1 Article 14 says that the Commission can reject the merger application if it will lead to a dominant position.
Restriction of Competition 1 Article 14 says that the Commission can reject a merger application if it will lead to a restriction of competition.
Public Interest (Pro D) 1 Article 14 says that the Commission can allow an otherwise impermissible merger when it will give appreciable benefits to consumers.
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 1 Article 14 says that the Commission can allow an otherwise impermissible merger when it will promote improvement of trade conditions.
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 5 prohibits dominant undertakings from withdrawing goods from the market.
Abusive Acts 1 Article 5 prohibits the abuse of a dominant position.
Price Setting 1 Article 5 prohibits imposing price setting.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 5 prohibits the imposition of discriminatory contract conditions.
Resale Price Maintenance 1 Article 6 prohibits resale price maintenance.
Obstacles to Entry 1 Article 5 prohibits the creation of barriers to entry.
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 5 allows an efficiency defense for when the otherwise prohibited actions will lead to positive economic consequences.
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 6 prohibits price fixing.
Tying 0
Market Division 1 Article 6 prohibits market division.
Output Restraint 1 Article 6 prohibits output restraint.
Market Sharing 1 Article 6 prohibits market sharing.
Eliminating Competitors 1 Article 6 prohibits agreements to eliminate other undertakings from the market.
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 6 prohibits collusive tendering.
Supply Refusal 0
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 6 provides an efficiency defense for otherwise impermissible agreements that will improve trade conditions or increase competitiveness.

References