Uzbekistan 1996
Score = 24
Governed by: Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Competition and Restriction of Monopolistic Activity at the Markets of 27 December 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | Article 2 says that the Act will apply to activities outside of Uzbekistan that have an effect in the country. |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Article 18 allows the Commission to impose fines for violations of the Act. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 1 | Article 16 allows the Commission to impose compulsory divestiture in the case of a dominant undertaking infringing the antimonopoly legislation. | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Article 20 allows other undertakings to make complaints to initiate proceedings. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Article 19 provides a cause of action for damages for injured 3rd parties. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 | ||
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | Article 14 requires mergers to be approved by the Commission. | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | Permission for the merger must be received before it can go through so notification must come prior to the merger. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Article 14 says that the Commission can reject the merger application if it will lead to a dominant position. |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | Article 14 says that the Commission can reject a merger application if it will lead to a restriction of competition. | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 1 | Article 14 says that the Commission can allow an otherwise impermissible merger when it will give appreciable benefits to consumers. | |
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 1 | Article 14 says that the Commission can allow an otherwise impermissible merger when it will promote improvement of trade conditions. | |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 5 prohibits dominant undertakings from withdrawing goods from the market. |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | Article 5 prohibits the abuse of a dominant position. | |
| Price Setting | 1 | Article 5 prohibits imposing price setting. | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 5 prohibits the imposition of discriminatory contract conditions. | |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | Article 6 prohibits resale price maintenance. | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | Article 5 prohibits the creation of barriers to entry. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 5 allows an efficiency defense for when the otherwise prohibited actions will lead to positive economic consequences. | |
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 6 prohibits price fixing. |
| Tying | 0 | ||
| Market Division | 1 | Article 6 prohibits market division. | |
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 6 prohibits output restraint. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | Article 6 prohibits market sharing. | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Article 6 prohibits agreements to eliminate other undertakings from the market. | |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Article 6 prohibits collusive tendering. | |
| Supply Refusal | 0 | ||
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 6 provides an efficiency defense for otherwise impermissible agreements that will improve trade conditions or increase competitiveness. |