Talk:Thailand (March 15, 1999)

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Revision as of 12:07, 24 July 2007 by AchalOza (talk | contribs) (New page: == Thailand 1999 Divestitures == ''Is this divestiture language?'' Section 8 - "The Commission shall have the powers and duties as . . . (2) to issue Notifications prescribing market sha...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thailand 1999 Divestitures

Is this divestiture language?

Section 8 - "The Commission shall have the powers and duties as . . . (2) to issue Notifications prescribing market share and sales volume off any business by reference to which a business operator is deemed to have market domination[.]"

--AchalOza 15:01, 18 July 2007 (MDT)

Hylton: not divestiture. --AchalOza 14:02, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Thailand 1999 3rd Party Remedies

The "claiming compensation" language seems to imply that the 3rd party may initiate an action to get money.

Section 40 - "The person suffering an injury in consequence of the violation of section 25, section 26, section 27, section 28 or section 29 may initiate an action for claiming compensation from the violator."

--AchalOza 15:09, 18 July 2007 (MDT)

Hylton: yes, initiating an action for compensation is sufficient to establish 3rd party initiation. --AchalOza 08:07, 24 July 2007 (EDT)

Thailand 1999 Dominance Obstacles to Entry

Would this count as a prohibition against setting obstacles to entry?

Section 25(4) - "[A dominant firm may not act by] intervening in the operation of business of other persons without justifiable reasons."

--AchalOza 17:33, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Hytlon: no, this is just a general prohibition against abusive acts. --AchalOza 08:07, 24 July 2007 (EDT)