Sweden (July 1, 1998)
Score = 21
Governed by: Competition Act of 14 January 1993 (SFS 1993:20), as last amended July 1 1998 (SFS 1998:648) (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”).[1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 0 | |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | §26-32 deal with fines for various infringements. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 1 | Article 36 allows divesting a merger deemed improper | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | §23(2) allows 3rd parties to lodge complaints with the MD and order the termination of the infringement. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | §33 requires infringing companies to pay damages to the parties injured as a result of their violations. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 1 | 3rd parties also have a right to appeal KKV decisions. | |
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | §37 requires pre-merger notifications for concentrations worth more than a certain monetary threshold. | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | §37 requires pre-merger notifications for concentrations worth more than a certain monetary threshold. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | §34a(2)(1) prohibits concentrations which strengthen or create a dominate position which will significantly restrict competition. |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | §34a(2)(1) prohibits concentrations which strengthen or create a dominate position which will significantly restrict competition. | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 1 | § 41 allows Stockholm City Court , at the request of the Swedish Competition Authority, to prevent merger from going through due to public interest | |
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 0 | ||
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | §19(2)(2) prohibits limiting production or market access. |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | §19(1) prohibits any abuse by an undertaking in a dominant position. | |
| Price Setting | 1 | §19(2)(1) prohibits price setting. | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | §19(2)(3) prohibits applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions. | |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | §6(2)(1) has been read as covering a prohibition on RPM.[2] | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 0 | ||
| Efficiency Defense | 0 | ||
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | §6(2)(1) prohibits price fixing. |
| Tying | 0 | ||
| Market Division | 0 | ||
| Output Restraint | 1 | §6(2)(2) prohibits limiting or controlling production. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | §6(2)(3) prohibits market sharing. | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 0 | ||
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 0 | ||
| Supply Refusal | 1 | A system using quantitative criteria to refuse to supply a particular company or group of companies is thought to be covered under §6.[3] | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | §8(1) gives an exemption to the §6 prohibitions for agreements that contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress. |
References
- ↑ http://www.kkv.se/t/Page____905.aspx
- ↑ Id. at 419.
- ↑ Id. at 423