India (January 13, 2003)
Score = 23
Governed by: The Competition Act, 2002, No. 12 of 2003 enacted on 13 January 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act’). [1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | Article 32 extends the scope of the Act to include acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India. |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Article 42 allows the Commission to fine parties for contravening their orders. |
| Prison Sentences | 1 | Article 42 allows the Commission to imprison parties for contravening their orders. | |
| Divestitures | 1 | Article 28 allows for the division of an enterprise in a dominant position. | |
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Article 19(1)(a) allows any person to submit a complaint to the Commission. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Article 34 gives the Commission the power to award compensation to injured 3rd parties. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 1 | Articles 34, 35, and 40 gives 3rd parties rights in proceedings. | |
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 1 | Article 6(2) says that enterprises have the option of notifying the Commission of mergers. |
| Mandatory | 0 | ||
| Pre-merger | 2 | Article 6 says this notification must happen within a week of the decision to merge. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Article 20(4)(d) lists the degree of market power as a consideration in merger assessment. |
| Restriction of Competition | 1 | Articles 20(1), 6(1) prohibit concentrations that are likely to cause an adverse effect on competition. | |
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 1 | Article 20(4)(m) lists the relative advantages to economic development of a merger as a factor in merger assessment. | |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 4(2)(b) prohibits limiting access to production or technical development. |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | Article 4(1) prohibits the abuse of a dominant position. | |
| Price Setting | 0 | ||
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 4(2)(a) lists discriminatory pricing as an abusive practice. | |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | Article 3(4)(e) prohibits RPM when it has adverse effects on competition. | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | Article 4(2)(c) prohibits limiting market access. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 0 | ||
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 3(3)(a) prohibits price fixing. |
| Tying | 1 | Article 3(4)(a) prohibits tying arrangements if they have adverse effects on competition. | |
| Market Division | 0 | ||
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 3(3)(b) prohibits output restraint. | |
| Market Sharing | 1 | Article 3(3)(c) prohibits market sharing. | |
| Eliminating Competitors | 0 | ||
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Article 3(3)(d) prohibits bid rigging. | |
| Supply Refusal | 1 | Article 3(4)(d) prohibits supply refusals where they adversely affect competition. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 3(3) allows an exemption for agreements that increase efficiency in production, supply, or distribution. |
References
- ↑ Competition Commission of India website, http://www.competition-commission-india.nic.in/Act/competition_act2002.pdf