Mauritius (March 14, 2003)

From AntitrustWorldWiki
Revision as of 15:32, 17 July 2007 by AchalOza (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Score = 13

Governed by: The Competition Bill N° VI of 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition Act”). [1]

Category Subcategory Score Comment
Scope Extraterritoriality 0
Remedies Fines 1 Article 25 allows for both fines and imprisonment for failing to comply with orders of the tribunal.
Prison Sentences 1 Article 25 allows for both fines and imprisonment for failing to comply with orders of the tribunal.
Divestitures 0
Private Enforcement 3rd Party Initiation 1 Article 15 outlines the rights of 3rd parties to be heard by the tribunal.
Remedies Available to 3rd Parties 0
3rd Party Rights in Proceedings 1 Article 19 allows any aggrieved person to appeal.
Merger Notification Voluntary 0
Mandatory 0
Pre-merger 0
Post-merger 0
Merger Assessment Dominance 0
Restriction of Competition 0
Public Interest (Pro D) 0
Public Interest (Pro Authority) 0
Other 0
Efficiency 0
Dominance Limits Access 1 Article 11(1)(b) prohibits limiting consumer access to production.
Abusive Acts 1 Article 11(1)(b) prohibits actions by a dominant company that may have an adverse effect on competition.
Price Setting 1 Article 11(2)(a) prohibits price setting.
Discriminatory Pricing 1 Article 11(2)(c) prohibits discriminatory pricing and other conditions.
Resale Price Maintenance 0
Obstacles to Entry 0
Efficiency Defense 0
Restrictive Trade Practices Price Fixing 1 Article 12(10(a) prohibits price fixing. Article 11(2)(a) prohibits predatory pricing.
Tying 1 Article 11(2)(d) prohibits tying arrangements.
Market Division 0
Output Restraint 1 Article 11(2)(b) prohibits limiting production to the prejudice of consumers.
Market Sharing 1 Article 12(1)(a) prohibits market sharing.
Eliminating Competitors
Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging 1 Article 14 prohibits bid rigging.
Supply Refusal 1 Article 12(1)(a) prohibits restricting supply of goods to a certain person.
Efficiency Defense 1 Article 16(b)(ii) provides a defense where restriction of competition is outweighed by the benefits of the increased efficiency with which goods are produced, supplied or distributed or services are supplied or made available.

References