Uruguay, 2007
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Score = 22
Governed by: Ley Nº 18.159 de 20 de julio de 2007 ("the statute").[1]
| Category | Subcategory | Score | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Extraterritoriality | 1 | Article 3 applies the statute to all firms whose activities reach the Uruguay marketplace. |
| Remedies | Fines | 1 | Articles 17 and 19 allow for the imposition of fines. |
| Prison Sentences | 0 | ||
| Divestitures | 0 | ||
| Private Enforcement | 3rd Party Initiation | 1 | Article 12 of the statute allows any person to submit formal complaints. |
| Remedies Available to 3rd Parties | 1 | Article 28 of the statute imposes a statute of limitations on third party damage actions. | |
| 3rd Party Rights in Proceedings | 0 | ||
| Merger Notification | Voluntary | 0 | |
| Mandatory | 3 | Article 7 states that mergers between large companies, or those with >50% market share must notify the Commission prior to merger. | |
| Pre-merger | 2 | See above. | |
| Post-merger | 0 | ||
| Merger Assessment | Dominance | 1 | Article 9 states that mergers which create a monopoly or near-monopoly are subject to approval. |
| Restriction of Competition | 0 | ||
| Public Interest (Pro D) | 1 | Article 9 states that the Commission must consider foreign competition when deciding whether to grant merger approval. | |
| Public Interest (Pro Authority) | 0 | ||
| Other | 0 | ||
| Efficiency | 1 | Article 9 states that the Commission must consider efficiency in deciding whether to approve a merger. | |
| Dominance | Limits Access | 1 | Article 4B of the statute states that no party may limit production or technical developments. |
| Abusive Acts | 1 | Article 2 prohibits abusive acts by dominant parties. | |
| Price Setting | 1 | Article 4A prohibits price setting. | |
| Discriminatory Pricing | 1 | Article 4c bans discriminatory pricing. | |
| Resale Price Maintenance | 1 | Article 4A bans indirectly setting buying or selling prices of goods. | |
| Obstacles to Entry | 1 | Articles 4F and 4G ban creating obstacles to entry, and limiting access to essential facilities. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 2 of the statute requires that efficiency be considered in evaluating otherwise restrictive practices. | |
| Restrictive Trade Practices | Price Fixing | 1 | Article 4A bans price fixing. |
| Tying | 1 | Article 4D bans tying arrangements. | |
| Market Division | 1 | Article 4H bans market division. | |
| Output Restraint | 1 | Article 4B bans output restraint. | |
| Market Sharing | 0 | ||
| Eliminating Competitors | 1 | Articles 4F and 4G prohibit creating restraints to entry or driving competitors out by denying access to essential facilities. | |
| Collusive Tendering/Bid-Rigging | 1 | Article 4E bans bid-rigging. | |
| Supply Refusal | 1 | Article 4I bans supply refusal. | |
| Efficiency Defense | 1 | Article 2 requires consideration of efficiency in assessing otherwise anticompetitive practices. |
References
- ↑ Google translation at http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.ccea.com.uy/boletines/leyN18159.htm&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=4&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DLey%2BN%25C2%25BA%2B18.159%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26channel%3Ds%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3D8yt%26sa%3DG